Abstract
AbstractIdentification of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) remains challenging, frequently resulting in a diagnostic delay for patients. Current benchmarks of delay are usually reported as mean data, which are typically skewed and therefore may be overestimating delay. Our aim was to determine the extent of median delay patients’ experience in receiving a diagnosis of axSpA and examine whether specific factors are associated with the presence of such delay. We conducted a systematic review across five literature databases (from inception to November 2021), with studies reporting the average time period of diagnostic delay in patients with axSpA being included. Any additional information examining associations between specific factors and delay were also extracted. A narrative synthesis was used to report the median range of diagnostic delay experienced by patients with axSpA and summarise which factors have a role in the delay. From an initial 11,995 articles, 69 reported an average time period of diagnostic delay, with 25 of these providing a median delay from symptom onset to diagnosis. Across these studies, delay ranged from 0.67 to 8 years, with over three-quarters reporting a median of between 2 years and 6 years. A third of all studies reported median delay data ranging from just 2 to 2.3 years. Of seven variables reported with sufficient frequency to evaluate, only ‘gender’ and ‘family history of axSpA’ had sufficient concordant data to draw any conclusion on their role, neither influenced the extent of the delay. Despite improvements in recent decades, patients with axSpA frequently experience years of diagnostic delay and this remains an extensive worldwide problem. This is further compounded by a mixed picture of the disease, patient and healthcare-related factors influencing delay.Key points• Despite improvements in recent decades, patients with axSpA frequently experience years of diagnostic delay.• Median diagnostic delay typically ranges from 2 to 6 years globally.• Neither ‘gender’ nor ‘family history of axSpA’ influenced the extent of diagnostic delay experienced.• Diagnostic delay based on mean, rather than median, data influences the interpretation of the delay time period and consistently reports a longer delay period.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Medicine,Rheumatology
Reference77 articles.
1. Kameda H, Kobayashi S, Tamura N, Kadono Y, Tada K, Yamamura M, Tomita T (2021) Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Modern Rheumatology 31:277–282
2. Morgan CLI, White A, Tomlinson M, Scott A, Tian H (2020) O16 Incidence, prevalence and associated comorbidity of axSpA within the UK: a retrospective database analysis. Rheumatology 59
3. Lapane KL, Khan S, Shridharmurthy D, Beccia A, Dubé C, Yi E, Kay J, Liu S-H (2020) Primary care physician perspectives on barriers to diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis: a qualitative study. BMC Family Practice 21:204
4. Hamilton L, Macgregor A, Toms A, Warmington V, Pinch E, Gaffney K (2015) The prevalence of axial spondyloarthritis in the UK: a cross-sectional cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:392
5. Sykes MP, Doll H, Sengupta R, Gaffney K (2015) Delay to diagnosis in axial spondyloarthritis: are we improving in the UK? Rheumatology (Oxford) 54:2283–2284
Cited by
43 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献