Abstract
AbstractIn the deep sea, the phylogeny and biogeography of only a few taxa have been well studied. Although more than 200 species in 32 genera have been described for the asellote isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 from all ocean basins, their phylogenetic relationships are not completely understood. There is little doubt about the close relationship of these families, but the taxonomic position of a number of genera is so far unknown. Based on a combined morphological phylogeny using the Hennigian method with a dataset of 107 described species and a molecular phylogeny based on three markers (COI, 16S, and 18S) with 75 species (most new to science), we could separate Desmosomatidae and Nannoniscidae as separate families. However, we could not support the concept of the subfamilies Eugerdellatinae Hessler, 1970 and Desmosomatinae Hessler, 1970. Most genera of both families were well supported, but several genera appear as para- or even polyphyletic. Within both families, convergent evolution and analogies caused difficulty in defining apomorphies for phylogenetic reconstructions and this is reflected in the results of the concatenated molecular tree. There is no biogeographic pattern in the distribution as the genera occur over the entire Atlantic and Pacific Ocean, showing no specific phylogeographical pattern. Poor resolution at deep desmosomatid nodes may reflect the long evolutionary history of the family and rapid evolutionary radiations.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum Frankfurt
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference99 articles.
1. Apakupakul, K., Siddall, M. E., & Burreson, E. M. (1999). Higher level relationships of leeches (Annelida: Clitellata: Euhirudinea) based on morphology and gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 12, 350–359.
2. Bauer, R. T. (1989). Decapod crustacean grooming: Functional morphology, adaptive value, and phylogenetic significance. Functional morphology of feeding and grooming in Crustacea. Crustacean Issues, 6, 49–73.
3. Bauer, R. T. (2013). Adaptive modification of appendages for grooming (cleaning, antifouling) and reproduction in the Crustacea. Functional Morphology and Diversity, 1, 327–364.
4. Birstein, J. A. (1963). Deep-sea isopod crustaceans of the northwestern Pacific Ocean. Institute of Oceanology of the U.S.S.R. Akademii Nauk, Moscow [in Russian with English summary] 213 pp.
5. Bouckaert, R., Heled, J., Kuhnert, D., Vaughan, T., Wu, C.-H., Xie, D., et al., (2014). BEAST 2: A software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Computational Biology, 10 (4), e1003537.