Contrasting phylogeographic patterns of intertidal mites (Acari, Oribatida) along the South African shoreline
-
Published:2022-04-18
Issue:3
Volume:22
Page:789-801
-
ISSN:1439-6092
-
Container-title:Organisms Diversity & Evolution
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Org Divers Evol
Author:
Pfingstl TobiasORCID, Wagner MaximilianORCID, Baumann JuliaORCID, Neethling Jan AndriesORCID, Bardel-Kahr Iris, Hugo-Coetzee Elizabeth A.ORCID
Abstract
AbstractThe South African coast is known to harbor four different species of intertidal oribatid mites and their distribution strongly correlates with marine ecoregions. Relatively little is known about the dispersal of these organisms and how populations of different locations are connected. To test dispersal abilities and connectivity of these South African species, we performed a morphometric and molecular genetic study. COI gene sequences of two of the widely distributed South African intertidal oribatid mite species revealed clearly contrasting patterns. Halozetes capensis, which occurs in the Agulhas Ecoregion, shows distinct genetic structuring, whereas Fortuynia elamellata micromorpha, which is distributed in the Natal Ecoregion, exhibits gene flow between all populations. The paleoenvironmental history and specific ocean current pattern are suggested to be responsible for these patterns. During the last glacial maximum, the colder climate and the weakening of the Agulhas Current possibly resulted in a bottleneck in the warm-adapted F. e. micromorpha populations, but the subsequent global warming allowed the populations to expand again. The cold-adapted H. capensis populations, on the other hand, experienced no dramatic changes during this period and thus could persist in the Agulhas Ecoregion. Considering transport on ocean currents, the Agulhas Current could be further responsible for the connectivity between the Fortuynia populations. But the deflection of this current in the Agulhas Ecoregion could support the isolation of Halozetes populations. The concomitant morphometric study demonstrated morphological homogeneity among populations of Fortuynia and thus confirms strong connectivity. The Halozetes populations, on the other hand, form two different morphological groups not reflecting geography.
Funder
OeAD-GmbH National Research Foundation University of Graz
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference46 articles.
1. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 57, 289–300. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2346101. Accessed 15 June 2021. 2. Clement, M., Snell, Q., Walker, P., Posada, D., & Crandall, K. (2002). TCS: Estimating gene genealogies. Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, International Proceedings, 2, 184. 3. Coetzee, L., & Marshall, D. J. (2003). A new Halozetes species (Acari: Oribatida: Ameronothridae) from the marine littoral of southern Africa. African Zoology, 38, 327–331. 4. Dingle, R. V., & Rogers, J. (1972). Effects of sea-level changes on the Pleistocene palaeoecology of the Agulhas Bank. Palaeoecology of Africa, 6, 55–58. 5. Emanuel, B. P., Bustamante, R. H., Branch, G. M., Eekhout, S., & Odendaal, F. J. (1992). A zoogeographic and functional approach to the selection of marine reserves on the west coast of South Africa. South African Journal of Marine Science, 12, 341–354. https://doi.org/10.2989/02577619209504710
|
|