Towards A More Flexible Approach To Enhanced Cooperation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Towards A More Flexible Approach To Enhanced Cooperation

Published:2009 Issue: Volume: Page:181-200
ISSN:
Container-title:Fifty Years of European Integration
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Amtenbrink Fabian,Kochenov Dimitry

Publisher

T.M.C. Asser Press

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-90-6704-631-2_11.pdf

Reference23 articles.

1. The Treaty of Amsterdam, amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and related acts (OJ 1997 C 340/01), introduced a new Title VIa on closer cooperation into the EU Treaty. Moreover, a new Art. 5a on closer cooperation was introduced into the EC Treaty. For a general overview and analysis of the original Amsterdam provisions see, e.g., C.-D. Ehlermann, ‘Differentiation, Flexibility, Closer Cooperation: The New Provisions of the Treaty of Amsterdam’, 4(3) ELJ (1998) p. 246; by the same author: ‘Increased Differentiation or Stronger Uniformity’, EUI Working Paper RSC No. 95/21 (Florence, European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre 1995), available at (last visited: 7 July 2008); E. Philippart and G. Edwards, ‘The Provisions on Closer Co-operation in the Treaty of Amsterdam: The Politics of Flexibility in the European Union’, 37(1) JCMS (1999) p. 87. Today’s provisions on enhanced cooperation are the result of amendments introduced by the Treaty of Nice: see namely No. 9 of the original Treaty of Nice amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts (OJ 2001 C 80/01).

2. J. Shaw, ‘The Treaty of Amsterdam: Challenges of Flexibility and Legitimacy’, 4(1) ELJ (1998) p. 63 at p. 66. See also D. Thym, ‘The Political Character of Supranational Differentiation’, EL Rev. (2006) p. 781 at pp. 798–799, who refers to an instrument of supranational differentiation.

3. J.M. de Areilza, ‘Enhanced Cooperation in the Treaty of Amsterdam: Some Critical Remarks’, 13 Jean Monnet Working Paper (1998), available at: < www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/98/98-13-4.html >, last visited: 7 July 2008, Section 4.1.

4. The official reading was that with only seven Member States wanting to participate, the required minimum number of eight had not been reached. See J. Ziller, ‘Le Traité de Prüm une Vraie-Fausse Coopération Renforcée dans L’Espace de Sécurité de Liberté et de Justice’, EUI Law Working Paper No. 2006/32 (Florence, European University Institute 2006), available at: < http://ssrn.com/abstract=965714 >, last visited: 7 July 2008, at p. 3. See also H. Hijmans, ‘De Methode Prüm’, 30 NJB (2007) p. 1902.

5. Philippart and Edwards, loc. cit. n. 2, at pp. 96–97. Generally on the negotiations see A.C.-G. Stubb, Negotiating Flexibility in the European Union: Amsterdam, Nice and Beyond (Basingstoke, Palgrave 2002).

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. List of Abbreviations;Enhanced Cooperation and European Tax Law;2021-06-17

2. Preface;Enhanced Cooperation and European Tax Law;2021-06-17

3. Series Editors’ Preface;Enhanced Cooperation and European Tax Law;2021-06-17

4. Dedication;Enhanced Cooperation and European Tax Law;2021-06-17

5. Copyright Page;Enhanced Cooperation and European Tax Law;2021-06-17