International Law as to the Use of Force

Author:

Weeramantry J. Romesh

Publisher

T.M.C. Asser Press

Reference69 articles.

1. P.C. Jessup, The Price of International Justice (New York, Columbia University Press 1971, at p. 82.

2. Briefly stated, the jus ad bellum refers to the rules applicable prior to the outbreak of war and that govern the circumstances under which a State is permitted to initiate force against another State. See also n. 3 infra. As to the relationship between the jus ad bellum and jus in bello, see E. Koppe, ‘Compensation for War Damages under Jus ad Bellum, infra pp. 417–433.

3. Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission, Partial Award, Jus Ad Bellum — Ethiopia’s Claims 1-8 (19 December 2005), 45 ILM (2006) p. 430 (hereinafter ‘Partial Award’). During the Commission’s proceedings concerning this claim; Eritrea and Ethiopia ‘utilized the terminology of jus ad bellum to describe the law governing the initial resort to force between them. At the hearing of this claim in April 2005, Ethiopia confirmed that it meant by this the use of force contrary to the Charter of the United Nations’. Partial Award, at para. 1, n. 1.

4. See, e.g., Y. Dinstein, War, Aggression and Self-defence, 4th edn. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 2005) p. 75 (‘the predominant conviction in the nineteenth (and early twentieth) century was that every State had a right — namely, an interest protected by international law — to embark upon war whenever it pleased. The discretion of States in this matter was portrayed as unfettered’). International law did, however, regulate through the jus in bello how warfare, once commenced, should be conducted.

5. P. Heilborn, Grundbegriffe des Völkerrechts (1912) p. 23, quoted in A. Randelzhofer, ‘Use of Force’, in R. Bernhardt, ed., Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. 4 (Amsterdam, Elsevier 2000) p. 1247. Because of this freedom to wage war, the concept of the right to self-defence remained in large part redundant; its invocation being made merely for political purposes and also in respect of incidents occurring during times of peace. See A. Randelzhofer, ‘Article 51’, in Bruno Simma, ed., The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, Vol. I (Oxford, Oxford University Press 2002) p. 789.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3