The International Criminal Legal Process: Towards a Realistic Model of International Criminal Law in Action-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The International Criminal Legal Process: Towards a Realistic Model of International Criminal Law in Action

Published:2010 Issue: Volume: Page:81-111
ISSN:
Container-title:Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Burchard Christoph

Publisher

T.M.C. Asser Press

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-90-6704-495-0_6

Reference134 articles.

1. For some notable exceptions see J. Hagan and R. Levi, ‘Crimes of War and the Force of Law’ (2005) 83 Social Forces 1499 (noting that ‘we know relatively little about how the coercive apparatus of criminalization is actualized through prosecutorial and court practices’); J. Wessel, ‘Judicial Policy-Making at the International Criminal Court: An Institutional Guide to Analyzing International Adjudication’ (2006) 44 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 373 (describing ICL in action as an ‘under-explored yet critical topic’ and noting a’ scarcity of attention’). Also see, e.g., R. Henham, Punishment and Process in International Criminal Trials (2005) (making a case for modelling the sentence decision-making process); E. Voeten, ‘The Politics of Judicial Appointments: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights’ (2007) 61 International Organization 669 (finding that his study of the ECHR is the ‘first effort to estimate judicial ideology of judges on any international court’ at 671 [emphasis added]).

2. On_the school of international legal process, into which I do not strictly place this chapter, see M.C. O’Connell, ‘New International Legal Process’, (1999) 93 AJIL 334 (defining it as ‘as a study of international law in its actual operation and the consideration of how international law could work better’). See also M. Hirsch, ‘The Sociology of International Law: Invitation to Study International Rules in their Context’ (2005) 55 University of Toronto Law Journal 891 (generally bemoaning the lack of sociological studies of international law); S. Merry, ‘Anthropology and International Law’ (2006) The Annual Review of Anthropology 99, arguing that ‘[a]nthropology can make significant contributions to the understanding and analysis of international law. Its focus on the meanings and practices of small social spaces, whether in villages or the corridors of international tribunals, enables a far deeper understanding of how the various facets of international law actually work.’ [emphasis added]

3. In_this sense, the decision is not an ex nihilo choice between different options, but the process of finding and implementing a solution to a problem, cf., R. Werle, Justizorganisation und Selbstverständnis der Richter (1977), at 269.

5. D. Simon, ‘A Psychological Model of Judicial Decision Making’ (1998) 30 Rutgers Law Journal 1, at 32.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Facing Facts in International Criminal Law;Journal of International Criminal Justice;2016-01-14