Proxy control

Author:

Doliana Aaron,Sundaresan Sandhya

Abstract

AbstractThe control dependency in grammar is conventionally distinguished into two classes: exhaustive (ii) and non-exhaustive (ii + (j)). Here, we show that, in languages like German and Italian, some speakers allow a new kind of “proxy control” which differs from both, such that, for a controller i, and a controllee j, j = proxy(i). The proxy function picks out a set of individuals that is discourse-pragmatically related to i. For such speakers, the German/Italian proxy control equivalent of the sentence: “Mariai asked Billj (for permission) [pro$_{proxy(i)}$ p r o x y ( i ) to leave work early]” would thus mean that Maria asked Bill for permission for some salient set of individuals related to herself to leave early. We examine the theoretical and empirical properties of this new control relation in detail, showing that it is irreducible to other, more familiar referential dependencies. Using standard empirical diagnostics, we then illustrate that proxy control can be instantiated both as a species of obligatory control (oc) and non-obligatory control (noc) in German and Italian and develop a syntactic and semantic model that derives each and details the factors conditioning the choice between the two. We also investigate the factors that condition different degrees of exhaustiveness (exhaustive vs. partial vs. proxy) in control, which then sheds light on why proxy control obtains in some languages, but not others and, within a language, is possible for some speakers but not others.

Funder

Projekt DEAL

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference61 articles.

1. Abusch, Dorit. 1997. Sequence of tense and temporal de re. Linguistics and Philosophy 20(1): 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005331423820.

2. Anand, Pranav, and Valentine Hacquard. 2013. Epistemics and attitudes. Semantics and Pragmatics 6: 1–59.

3. Interface explorations;Rajesh Bhatt,2006

4. Bhatt, Rajesh, and Roumyana Izvorski. 1998. Genericity, implicit arguments and control. In Student Conference in Linguistics (SCIL) 7.

5. Bjorkman, Bronwyn, and Hedde Zeijlstra. 2019. Checking up on “(phi-) agree”. Linguistic Inquiry 50(3) 527–569.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Noncanonical Obligatory Control;Language and Linguistics Compass;2024-04-10

2. Construction of a Multimodal Corpus of College Students’ Spoken English Based on Semantic Concepts;Mobile Information Systems;2022-05-11

3. On the obligatory versus no control split in Korean;Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today;2021-08-15

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3