Author:
Doliana Aaron,Sundaresan Sandhya
Abstract
AbstractThe control dependency in grammar is conventionally distinguished into two classes: exhaustive (i→i) and non-exhaustive (i→i + (j)). Here, we show that, in languages like German and Italian, some speakers allow a new kind of “proxy control” which differs from both, such that, for a controller i, and a controllee j, j = proxy(i). The proxy function picks out a set of individuals that is discourse-pragmatically related to i. For such speakers, the German/Italian proxy control equivalent of the sentence: “Mariai asked Billj (for permission) [pro$_{proxy(i)}$
p
r
o
x
y
(
i
)
to leave work early]” would thus mean that Maria asked Bill for permission for some salient set of individuals related to herself to leave early. We examine the theoretical and empirical properties of this new control relation in detail, showing that it is irreducible to other, more familiar referential dependencies. Using standard empirical diagnostics, we then illustrate that proxy control can be instantiated both as a species of obligatory control (oc) and non-obligatory control (noc) in German and Italian and develop a syntactic and semantic model that derives each and details the factors conditioning the choice between the two. We also investigate the factors that condition different degrees of exhaustiveness (exhaustive vs. partial vs. proxy) in control, which then sheds light on why proxy control obtains in some languages, but not others and, within a language, is possible for some speakers but not others.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference61 articles.
1. Abusch, Dorit. 1997. Sequence of tense and temporal de re. Linguistics and Philosophy 20(1): 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005331423820.
2. Anand, Pranav, and Valentine Hacquard. 2013. Epistemics and attitudes. Semantics and Pragmatics 6: 1–59.
3. Interface explorations;Rajesh Bhatt,2006
4. Bhatt, Rajesh, and Roumyana Izvorski. 1998. Genericity, implicit arguments and control. In Student Conference in Linguistics (SCIL) 7.
5. Bjorkman, Bronwyn, and Hedde Zeijlstra. 2019. Checking up on “(phi-) agree”. Linguistic Inquiry 50(3) 527–569.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献