Three arguments for an individual concept analysis of specificational sentences-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Three arguments for an individual concept analysis of specificational sentences

Published:2020-09-18 Issue:3 Volume:39 Page:687-708
ISSN:0167-806X
Container-title:Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
language:en
Short-container-title:Nat Lang Linguist Theory

Author:

Arregi Karlos,Francez Itamar,Martinović Martina

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11049-020-09491-x.pdf

Reference31 articles.

1. Adger, David, and Gillian Ramchand. 2003. Predication and equation. Linguistic Inquiry 34(3): 325–359.

2. Aloni, Maria, and Floris Roelofsen. 2011. Interpreting concealed questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 34: 443–478.

3. Baker, C. L. 1968. Indirect questions in English. Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

4. Barros, Matthew. 2016. Specification as an inter-taxonomic phenomenon. Ms., Yale University. http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/repo/semanticsArchive/article/001575.

5. Caponigro, Ivano, and Daphna Heller. 2007. The non-concealed nature of free relatives: Implications for connectivity in specificational sentences. In Direct compositionality, eds. Chris Barker and Pauline Jacobson, 237–263. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Copular asymmetries in belief reports;Natural Language Semantics;2024-08-16

2. The role played by specificational clauses within the text;RIC STOR ARTE;2024

3. From Naming Verb to Copula: The Case of Wangerooge Frisian Heit;Journal of Germanic Linguistics;2023-05-11

4. Person effects in agreement with Icelandic low nominatives: An experimental investigation;Natural Language & Linguistic Theory;2022-12-27

5. Reversibility in specificational copular sentences and pseudoclefts;Natural Language & Linguistic Theory;2022-04-07