The Wither or Thrive Model of Resilience: an Integrative Framework of Dynamic Vulnerability and Resilience in the Face of Repeated Stressors During the COVID-19 Pandemic
-
Published:2022-07-13
Issue:4
Volume:3
Page:261-282
-
ISSN:2662-2424
-
Container-title:Adversity and Resilience Science
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:ADV RES SCI
Author:
Godara MalvikaORCID, Silveira Sarita, Matthäus Hannah, Singer Tania
Abstract
AbstractDuring the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic, empirical efforts in the psychological sciences have been unequivocally focused on understanding the psychosocial impact on resilience and vulnerability. While current empirical work is guided by different existing theoretical models of resilience and vulnerability, the emerging datasets have also pointed to a necessity for an update of these models. Due to the unique features and developments specific to the current pandemic such as the occurrence of repeated collective stressors of varying durations, in the current position paper, we introduce the Wither or Thrive model of Resilience (With:Resilience). It integrates key aspects of prevailing psychological resilience frameworks within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and extends them by (1) moving away from single scale approaches towards a higher-order latent expression of resilience and vulnerability incorporating also non-clinical mental health markers, (2) proposing different trajectories of resilience-vulnerability emerging across repeated stressors over long periods of time, and (3) by incorporating multiple influencing factors including aspects of the socio-economic concept of social cohesion as well as separate mediating processing mechanisms. We propose that With:Resilience will enable a more nuanced approach and appropriate analytical investigation of the vast incoming data on mental health and resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic, and we suggest some concrete methodological approaches. This framework will assist in the development of actionable public health guidelines for society in the present and future pandemic contexts as well as aid policy making and the interventional sciences aimed at protecting the most vulnerable amongst us.
Funder
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Berlin University Alliance MPG Social Neuroscience Lab
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference192 articles.
1. Abel, M. H. (2002). Humor, stress, and coping strategies. Humor – International Journal of Humor Research, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.15.4.365 2. Ahrens, K. F., Neumann, R. J., Kollmann, B., Brokelmann, J., von Werthern, N. M., Malyshau, A., Weichert, D., Lutz, B., Fiebach, C. J., Wessa, M., Kalisch, R., Plichta, M. M., Lieb, K., Tüscher, O., & Reif, A. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on mental health in Germany: Longitudinal observation of different mental health trajectories and protective factors. Translational Psychiatry, 11(1), 392. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01508-2 3. Aknin, L., de Neve, J. E., Dunn, E., Fancourt, D., Goldberg, E., Helliwell, J., Jones, S. P., Karam, E., Layard, R., Lyubomirsky, S., Rzepa, A., Saxena, S., Thornton, E. M., VanderWeele, T. J., Whillans, A. v., Zaki, J., Caman, O. K., & Amour, Y. B. (2021). A review and response to the early mental health and neurological consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. Perspectives on Psychological Science, In Press. 4. Aldao, A. (2013). The Future of Emotion Regulation Research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459518 5. Aldao, A., Sheppes, G., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation flexibility. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39(3), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9662-4
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|