Abstract
AbstractPrevious experiments observe a chain of unkindness: unkindly treated people treat an innocent third party unkindly. As a remedy, it has been proposed that the unkindly treated person engages in emotional regulation by writing a letter to the unkind person. Indeed, subjects who received little money were willing to leave more to a third person when they were writing a letter rather than waiting.Here, we examine whether emotional regulation is indeed behind this observation. In line with emotional regulation, we find that letter writing also leads to more giving if the person is treated unkindly by being assigned to a frustrating rather than a pleasant job. Being able to write, however, does not affect self-reported happiness differently from having to wait. Even more strikingly, subjects assigned to pleasant jobs also give more when writing rather than waiting. This is not consistent with emotional regulation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Bahr, G., and T. Requate. 2014. Reciprocity and giving in a consecutive three-person dictator game with social interaction. German Economic Review 15(3):374–392.
2. Bardsley, N. 2008. Dictator game giving: altruism or artefact? Experimental Economics 11(2):122–133.
3. Ben-Ner, A., L. Putterman, F. Kong, and D. Magan. 2004. Reciprocity in a two-part dictator game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 53(3):333–352.
4. Benndorf, V., H.A. Rau, and C. Sölch. 2018. Minimizing learning behavior in repeated real-effort tasks, cege Discussion Papers, No. 343, Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research (cege), University of Göttingen, Göttingen.
5. Bradley, M.M., and P.J. Lang. 1994. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 25(1):49–59.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献