Abstract
AbstractCompanies’ objectives extend beyond mere profitability, to what is generally known as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Empirical research effort of CSR is typically concentrated on a limited number of aspects. We focus on the whole set of CSR activities to identify any structure to that set. In this analysis, we take data from 1850 of the largest international companies via the conventional MSCI database and focus on four major dimensions of CSR: Environment, Social/Stakeholder, Labor, and Governance. To identify any structure hidden in almost constant average values, we apply the popular technique of K-means clustering. When determining the number of clusters, which is especially difficult in the case at hand, we use an equivalent clustering criterion that is complementary to the square-error K-means criterion. Our use of this complementary criterion aims at obtaining clusters that are both large and farthest away from the center. We derive from this a method of extracting anomalous clusters one-by-one with a follow-up removal of small clusters. This method has allowed us to discover a rather impressive process of change from predominantly uniform patterns of CSR activities along the four dimensions in 2007 to predominantly single-focus patterns of CSR activities in 2012. This change may reflect the dynamics of increasingly interweaving and structuring CSR activities into business processes that are likely to be extended into the future.
Funder
Pennsylvania State University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference67 articles.
1. AACSB International. 2017. Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Business Accreditation. http://www.aacsb.edu/-/media/aacsb/docs/accreditation/standards/business-2017-update.ashx?la=en. Accessed 23 Sep 2017.
2. Adam, A.M., and T. Shavit. 2008. How can a ratings-based method for assessing corporate social responsibility (CSR) provide an incentive to firms excluded from socially responsible investment indices to invest in CSR? Journal of Business Ethics 82 (4): 899–905.
3. Albinger, H.S., and S.J. Freeman. 2000. Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. Journal of Business Ethics 28 (3): 243–254.
4. Arthur, D., and Vassilivitskii, S. 2007. K-means ++: The advantages of careful seeding. In Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1027–1035.
5. Betts, S.C., and Z. Taran. 2011. Conflicting issues and corporate social responsibility: aligning organizational efforts with stakeholder interests. Journal of International Management Studies 11 (3): 39–46.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献