Author:
Blaufus Kay,Kreinacke Marcos,Mantei Britta
Abstract
AbstractUsing a theoretical model for risky investment decisions, we study the effect of interest deductibility restrictions on the choice of organizational form. We analyze the two most widely used approaches: first, rules that limit the interest deductibility if the firm’s leverage exceeds a specific level, and second, rules that restrict the interest deduction if the interest expenses exceed a specific percentage of the firm’s earnings. Although these restrictions apply uniformly for partnerships and corporations in many countries, we find that they usually distort the choice of organizational form. We demonstrate that only leverage-based interest deductibility restrictions can in theory be modified to achieve organizational form neutrality. However, this requires a legal form dependent application or absence of dividend taxation and in any case a full loss offset which is in contrast to current law in many countries. If one considers corporate loss offset limitations, both types of interest deductibility restrictions always distort the choice of organizational form. Thus, the introduction of interest deductibility restrictions is actually in conflict with the legislators’ often declared aim to design tax systems that are neutral with respect to the choice of organizational form.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference21 articles.
1. Blaufus, Kay, and Jochen Hundsdoerfer. 2008. Taxes and the choice between risky and risk-free debt: on the neutrality of credit default taxation. Review of Managerial Science 2: 161–181.
2. Blaufus, Kay, and Britta Mantei. 2014. Taxes, risky investments, and the simultaneous choice of legal form and financing. Journal of Business Economics 84: 1111–1141.
3. Buettner, Thiess, Michael Overesch, Ulrich Schreiber and Georg Wamser. 2006. The impact of thin-capitalization rules on multinationals’ financing and investment decisions. CESifo working paper series, no. 1817.
4. Buettner, Thiess, Michael Overesch, Ulrich Schreiber, and Georg Wamser. 2012. The impact of thin-capitalization rules on the capital structure of multinational firms. Journal of Public Economics 96: 930–938.
5. Buslei, Hermann, and Martin Simmler. 2012. The impact of introducing an interest barrier: evidence from the German corporation tax reform 2008. Discussion Papers: German Institute for Economic Research, DIW Berlin, No. 1215.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献