Comparison of Therapeutic Outcomes of Transabdominal Pararectus Approach and Modified Stoppa Approach in Treating Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures

Abstract

Abstract Objective Pelvic and acetabular fractures are common orthopedic diseases, and this research was to investigate the therapeutic effects of pararectus and Stoppa approaches in treating complex pelvic acetabular fractures. Methods The clinical information of patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures treated surgically in Lu'an Hospital of Chinese medicine, China from January 2016 to April 2020 was analyzed. There were 30 cases each in the transabdominal pararectus approach and modified Stoppa approach groups. The operation time, incision length, blood loss, and postoperative complications of both groups were recorded according to the Merle d'Aubigné-Postel hip score. The recovery of hip function was evaluated 6 months after surgery, and the clinical and therapeutic efficacies of the two groups were compared. Results The patients were followed up for 6–7 months (average, 6.5 months). The average operation time, incision length, and blood loss in the pararectus and Stoppa approach groups were 180 ± 41.105 min, 8.667 ± 1.373 cm, 259.667 ± 382 mL and 202.667 ± 32.793 min, 11.600 ± 1.958 cm, and 353.667 ± 590 mL, respectively. The satisfactory rate of fracture reduction, excellent and good rate of hip function score, and incidence of complications were 28/30, 27/30, 1/30 and 25/30, 25/30, 3/30, respectively. There were significant differences in operation time, incision length, and blood loss between the two groups (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the excellent and good rate of hip function score, fracture reduction satisfaction, and complication rate between both groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions The pararectus approach can reveal the better anatomical structure of the pelvis and acetabulum, such as the corona mortis and quadrilateral plate, for conducive fracture reduction and fixation. It can also effectively shorten the length of the incision, reduce operative blood loss, and shorten the operation time. It is a better choice for the clinical treatment of complex pelvic and acetabular fractures.