Proximal Fibulectomy for Giant Cell Tumours: What Works!
-
Published:2024-09-03
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0019-5413
-
Container-title:Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JOIO
Author:
Prajapati Ashwin, Tadala Harsha S. S., Gulia AshishORCID, Puri Ajay
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is the most common primary tumor of proximal fibula. Because of its close proximity to vascular structures, common peroneal nerve (CPN) and attachment of lateral collateral ligament (LCL), proximal fibulectomy poses unique challenges. We analyzed oncological and functional outcome of patients who underwent proximal fibulectomy for GCTB of proximal fibula.
Material and methods
Between January 2006 and December 2020, 23 patients underwent proximal fibulectomy for GCTB of proximal fibula, four were recurrent tumors. Mean resection length was 9 cm (5 to 15 cm). The LCL and biceps tendon were not reconstructed in 22 cases. The common peroneal nerve was sacrificed in seven patients including three recurrent cases. Functional status was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) scoring system.
Results
There were two vascular complications and one infection. With 4 patients lost to follow up, mean follow up was 90 months (12 to 197). No patient had local or distant recurrence. Mean MSTS score was 26 (21 to 30). Eleven of 23 patients (48%) had loss of common peroneal nerve function with poorer functional outcome. No patient had symptoms suggestive of knee instability.
Conclusion
Proximal fibulectomy is oncologically safe. Reconstruction of the LCL attachment is not mandatory and patients do not have symptomatic knee instability. Functional outcomes are compromised after sacrifice of common peroneal nerve and may be potentially improved with tendon transfers at index surgery.
Funder
Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (HBCHRC) - Chandigarh
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference6 articles.
1. Arikan, Y., Misir, A., Ozer, D., Kizkapan, T. B., Yildiz, K. I., Saygili, M. S., et al. (2018). The incidence and distribution of primary fibula tumors and tumor-like lesions: A 35-year experience. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery., 26(3), 230949901879818. 2. Kundu, Z. S., Tanwar, M., Rana, P., & Sen, R. (2018). Fibulectomy for primary proximal fibular bone tumors. Indian J Orthop., 52(1), 3–9. 3. Abdel, M. P., Papagelopoulos, P. J., Morrey, M. E., Wenger, D. E., Rose, P. S., & Sim, F. H. (2010). Surgical management of 121 benign proximal fibula tumors. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 468(11), 3056–3062. 4. Puri, A., Gulia, A., Hegde, P., Verma, V., & Rekhi, B. (2019). Neoadjuvant denosumab: its role and results in operable cases of giant cell tumour of bone. Bone Joint J., 101(2), 170–7. 5. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ. (1993). A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. pp. 241–6.
|
|