Trends of Publications on Single- and Double-Bundle ACL Reconstructions over the Last 20 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis of the PubMed Literature
-
Published:2023-08-29
Issue:10
Volume:57
Page:1623-1632
-
ISSN:0019-5413
-
Container-title:Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JOIO
Author:
D’Ambrosi RiccardoORCID, Kambhampati Srinivas B. S.ORCID, Vishwanathan KarthikORCID, Vaish AbhishekORCID, Vaishya RajuORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To improve the clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), there have been attempts to reproduce anatomic reconstruction by modifying the single-bundle (SB) and double-bundle (DB) techniques. Although DB ACLR restores better rotational control compared to SB ACLR, it is still debatable whether there are higher clinical outcomes in favor of DB ACLR. We aimed to study the trends of publications on SB and DB ACLR techniques over the last 20 years.
Methods
For this bibliometric study, we performed a PubMed search on 31/05/2022 with a well-defined search strategy. The articles were downloaded into Excel software, and citations were determined from the iCite website for PubMed. The analysis was performed using SPSS software version 28.0.1. Data mining was performed using Orange software, Mac version 3.32.0, from the titles of all articles and each group of SB and DB ACLR. The output is presented as word clouds.
Results
A total of 10,530 publications were identified, of which 9699 publications (92.1%) pertained to SB-ACLR and 831 publications (7.9%) to DB-ACLR. There was a steady increase in the publications on SB-ACLR until 2012, followed by a steep increase that peaked in 2021. The highest number of publications on DB-ACLR was in 2012 (n = 76; 9.1%). The mean citations per year for SB-ACLR and DB-ACLR were 2.87 ± 4.31 and 2.74 ± 3.17, respectively. The most prolific journals publishing on this topic were Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy, American Journal of Sports Medicine, and Arthroscopy. The top three articles that received the maximum number of citations were from Japanese authors.
Conclusion
The number of publications related to SB-ACLR was significantly higher than that related to DB-ACLR in the last 20 years. The publications related to DB-ACLR have decreased in the recent past, after reaching a peak in 2012. The citations per year of SB-ACLR and DB-ACLR were similar.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Milano
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Reference41 articles.
1. Brzeszczyński, F., Turnbull, K., McLelland, C., MacDonald, D., Lawson, G., & Hamilton, D. (2022). Functional outcomes and return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in recreational athletes: A systematic review. The Knee, 36, 103–113. 2. D’Ambrosi, R., Meena, A., Raj, A., Ursino, N., Formica, M., Herbort, M., & Fink, C. (2023). Multiple revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Not the best but still good. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 31, 559–571. 3. Vaishya, R., Agarwal, A. K., Ingole, S., & Vijay, V. (2015). Current Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review. Cureus, 7, e378. 4. Baawa-Ameyaw, J., Plastow, R., Begum, F. A., Kayani, B., Jeddy, H., & Haddad, F. (2021). Current concepts in graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. EFORT Open Reviews, 6, 808–815. 5. Cohen, D., Yao, P. F., Uddandam, A., de Sa, D., & Arakgi, M. E. (2022). Etiology of Failed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Scoping Review. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 15, 394–401.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|