Effectiveness and Biomechanical Analysis of the Ortho-Bridge System on Femoral Fracture Healing: A Retrospective Analysis
-
Published:2022-08-09
Issue:10
Volume:56
Page:1795-1803
-
ISSN:0019-5413
-
Container-title:Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JOIO
Author:
Qi Yubin,Yao Lin,Long Yuntao,Zuo Guilai,Zhang Qingjie,Liu Zhenlin,Wang Wen
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Among the surgical methods for femoral fractures, the Ortho-Bridge System (OBS) appears to heal fractures via an uncommon process. We compared its effectiveness and biomechanical aspects to those of a locking compression plate (LCP) and explained the healing process demonstrated by the OBS.
Methods
Eleven femoral shaft fracture cases treated with OBS between July 2017 and May 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and radiographic data were collected during regular postoperative follow-up visits and assessed via the Harris Hip Score and Knee Society Score. We performed biomechanical experiments of OBS. We simulated different fracture conditions and selected appropriate screw holes at the fracture’s far and near segments. The OBS module was placed according to the position of LCP’s locking hole at both ends of the fracture; then, a static three-point bending test was performed.
Results
All patients had contralateral callus growth with secondary fracture healing. Healing time was 3–5 months with excellent hip and knee function. When the key screw distance was 22–34 mm, the OBS was significantly less stiff than the LCP (P < 0.05). The stiffness of LCP and OBS decreased significantly when the key screw distance was 49–82 mm, with the LCP being slightly stronger (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
Femoral shaft fracture treatment with OBS demonstrated secondary healing. When the distance between the key screws was 20–40 mm, the elasticity was higher in OBS than in LCP, possibly producing axial micro-motion to stimulate callus formation and promote fracture healing, which differ from the plate’s primary healing process.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Reference27 articles.
1. Enninghorst, N., McDougall, D., Evans, J. A., Sisak, K., & Balogh, Z. J. (2013). Population-based epidemiology of femur shaft fractures. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 74, 1516–1520. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31828c3dc9 2. Mills, L., Tsang, J., Hopper, G., Keenan, G., & Simpson, A. H. (2016). The multifactorial aetiology of fracture nonunion and the importance of searching for latent infection. Bone & Joint Research, 5, 512–519. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.510.BJR-2016-0138 3. Wu, K. J., Li, S. H., Yeh, K. T., Chen, I. H., Lee, R. P., Yu, T. C., et al. (2019). The risk factors of nonunion after intramedullary nailing fixation of femur shaft fracture in middle age patients. Medicine (Baltimore), 98, e16559. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016559 4. Šmejkal, K., Lochman, P., Trlica, J., Novotný, P., Šimek, J., & Dědek, T. (2015). Impaired healing after surgery for femoral fractures. Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, 82, 358–3563. in Czech. 5. Neumann, M. V., Südkamp, N. P., & Strohm, P. C. (2015). Management of femoral shaft fractures. Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, 82, 22–32.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|