Making the (Business) Case for Clinical Ethics Support in the UK

Author:

Machin L. L.ORCID,Wilkinson Mark

Abstract

AbstractThis paper provides a series of reflections on making the case to senior leaders for the introduction of clinical ethics support services within a UK hospital Trust at a time when clinical ethics committees are dwindling in the UK. The paper provides key considerations for those building a (business) case for clinical ethics support within hospitals by drawing upon published academic literature, and key reports from governmental and professional bodies. We also include extracts from documents relating to, and annual reports of, existing clinical ethics support within UK hospitals, as well as extracts from our own proposal submitted to the Trust Board. We aim for this paper to support other ethicists and/or health care staff contemplating introducing clinical ethics support into hospitals, to facilitate the process of making the case for clinical ethics support, and to contribute to the key debates in the literature around clinical ethics support. We conclude that there is a real need for investment in clinical ethics in the UK in order to build the evidence base required to support the wider introduction of clinical ethics support into UK hospitals. Furthermore, our perceptions of the purpose of, and perceived needs met through, clinical ethics support needs to shift to one of hospitals investing in their staff. Finally, we raise concerns over the optional nature of clinical ethics support available to practitioners within UK hospitals.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Health (social science),Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Reference119 articles.

1. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. (2009). Improving competence in clinical ethics consultation: An education guide. Glenview, IL: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.

2. Andereck, W. S. (1992). Development of a hospital ethics committee: Lessons from five years of case consultations. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 1(1), 41–50.

3. Austin, W. (2007). The ethics of everyday practice: Healthcare environments as moral communities. Advances in Nursing Science, 30(1), 81–88.

4. Austin, L. (2018). UK processes for resolution of disagreements about the care of critically ill children. https://nuffieldbioethics.org/project/disagreements-care-critically-ill-children/literature-reviews/austin-l-2018-uk-processes-for-resolution-of-disagreements-in-care-of-critically-ill-children. Accessed 9 July 2020.

5. Bacchetta, M. D., & Fins, J. J. (1997). The economics of clinical ethics programs: A quantitative justification. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 6(4), 451–460.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3