Author:
Frolic Andrea,Murray Leslie,Swinton Marilyn,Miller Paul
Abstract
AbstractThis study assessed the attitudes and needs of physicians and health professional staff at a tertiary care hospital in Canada regarding the introduction of physician assisted dying (PAD) during 2015–16. This research aimed to develop an understanding of the wishes, concerns and hopes of stakeholders related to handling requests for PAD; to determine what supports/structures/resources health care professionals (HCP) require in order to ensure high quality and compassionate care for patients requesting PAD, and a supportive environment for all healthcare providers across the moral spectrum. This study constituted a mixed methods design with a qualitative descriptive approach for the study’s qualitative component. A total of 303 HCPs working in a tertiary care hospital completed an online survey and 64 HCPs working in hospital units with high mortality rates participated in 8 focus group discussions. Both focus group and survey data coalesced around several themes to support the implementation of PAD following the decriminalization of this practice: the importance of high quality care; honoring moral diversity; supporting values (such as autonomy, privacy, beneficence); and developing resources, including collaboration with palliative care, education, policies and a specialized team. This study provided the foundational evidence to support the development of the PAD program described in other papers in this collection, and can be a model for gathering evidence from stakeholders to inform the implementation of PAD in any healthcare organization.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Health (social science),Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference22 articles.
1. Attaran, A., & Phil, D. (2015). Unanimity on death with dignity-legalizing physician assisted dying in Canada. New England Journal of Medicine, 372, 2080–2082.
2. Canadian Insitute for Health Information. (2018). Access to palliative care in Canada. Ottawa, ON: CIHI. Retrieved from https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/access-palliative-care-2018-en-web.pdf
3. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00988593
4. Curry, L., Schwartz, H., Gruman, C., et al. (2000). Physicians’ voices on physician-assisted suicide: Looking beyond the numbers. Ethics & Behavior, 10(4), 337–361.
5. Denier, Y., Dierckx de Casterlé, B., De Bal, N., et al. (2009). “It’s intense, you know.” Nurses’ experiences in caring for patients requesting euthanasia. Medicine, HealthCare & Philosophy, 13(1), 41–48.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献