Utilizing Zebrafish Embryos for Replication of Tulane Virus: A Human Norovirus Surrogate
-
Published:2024-08-23
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1867-0334
-
Container-title:Food and Environmental Virology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Food Environ Virol
Author:
Chandran Sahaana,Gibson Kristen E.
Abstract
AbstractThe zebrafish larvae/embryo model has been shown to support the replication of seven strains (G1.7[P7], GII.2[P16], GII.3[P16], GII.4[P4], GII.4[P16], GII.6[P7], and GII.17[P13]) of human norovirus (HuNoV). However, due to challenges in consistently obtaining HuNoV-positive stool samples from clinical sources, evaluating HuNoV surrogates in this model is highly valuable. This study assesses the potential of zebrafish embryos and larvae as a model for Tulane virus (TuV) replication. Three infection methods were examined: microinjection, immersion, and feeding. Droplet digital PCR was used to quantify viral RNA across all three infection methods. Microinjection of 3 nL of TuV into zebrafish embryos (< 6-h post-fertilization) resulted in significant replication, with viral RNA levels reaching 6.22 logs at 4-day post-infection. In contrast, the immersion method showed no replication after immersing 4-day post-fertilization (dpf) larvae in TuV suspension for 6 h. Similarly, no replication was observed with the feeding method, where Paramecium caudatum loaded with TuV were fed to 4 dpf larvae. The findings indicate that the zebrafish embryo model supports TuV replication through the microinjection method, suggesting that TuV may serve as a useful surrogate for studying HuNoV pathogenesis. Additionally, TuV can be utilized in place of HuNoV in method optimization studies using the zebrafish embryo model, circumventing the limited availability of HuNoV.
Funder
Arkansas Biosciences Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. Ahmed, S. M., Hall, A. J., Robinson, A. E., Verhoef, L., Premkumar, P., Parashar, U. D., Koopmans, M., & Lopman, B. A. (2014). Global prevalence of norovirus in cases of gastroenteritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 14(8), 725–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(14)70767-4 2. Alotaibi, M. A. (2011, June 30). Interaction of free-living protozoa with water-borne human pathogenic viruses and protection from disinfection. University of Leicester. Retrieved July 8, 2024, from https://figshare.le.ac.uk/articles/thesis/Interaction_of_Free-living_protozoa_with_water-borne_human_pathogenic_viruses_and_protection_from_disinfection/10102316 3. Arthur, S. E., & Gibson, K. E. (2015). Physicochemical stability profile of Tulane virus: A human norovirus surrogate. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 119(3), 868–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12878 4. Bartsch, S. M., Lopman, B. A., Ozawa, S., Hall, A. J., & Lee, B. Y. (2016). Global economic burden of norovirus gastroenteritis. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151219 5. Cannon, J. L., Bonifacio, J., Bucardo, F., Buesa, J., Bruggink, L., Chan, M.C.-W., Fumian, T. M., Giri, S., Gonzalez, M. D., Hewitt, J., Lin, J.-H., Mans, J., Muñoz, C., Pan, C.-Y., Pang, X.-L., Pietsch, C., Rahman, M., Sakon, N., & Selvarangan, R. (2021). Global trends in norovirus genotype distribution among children with acute gastroenteritis. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 27(5), 1438–1445. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2705.204756
|
|