Abstract
AbstractScholars depict punishment as a moral dialogue between the community and the offender, which addresses both the offender’s crime and character. However, how the penal message evolves vis a vis that crime and character as it passes through the different stages of the criminal process has remained under-theorized. This article, building on communicative theory, explores the interrelation between crime and character along the penal process, from sentencing, through prison, to parole release. We argue that in the penal dialogue the relationship between crime and character evolves in a dynamic way through three phases: separateness (sentencing), fusion (prison), and re-distinction (parole) of crime and character. The proposed analysis develops the communicative meaning of the penal process, provides a normative account of the work of punishment administration authorities, and explores applications of our proposed normative analysis for the administration of the punishment.
Funder
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference75 articles.
1. Apt, Benjamin L. 2016. “Do We Know How to Punish?” New Criminal Law Review, 19 (3): 437-472.
2. Ashworth, Andrew, & Lucia Zedner. 2008. “Defending the Criminal law: Reflections on the Changing Character of Crime, Procedure, and Sanctions.” Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2: 21-51.
3. Ballas, Irit. 2022. “Boundaries, Obligations and Belonging: The Reconfiguration of Citizenship in Emergency Criminal Regimes.” Theoretical Criminology, 26(2), 183-201.
4. Beccaria, Cesare. [1764] 2009. On Crimes and Punishments and Other Writings. Edited by Aaron Thomas, University of Toronto Press.
5. Bell, Kristen. 2021. “Toward a Normative Theory of Parole Grounded in Agency.” Philosophical Issues, 31: 24-40.