Tensions and coalitions: A new trade agreement affects the policy space for nutrition in Vietnam
-
Published:2022-03-02
Issue:5
Volume:14
Page:1123-1141
-
ISSN:1876-4517
-
Container-title:Food Security
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Food Sec.
Author:
Harris JodyORCID, Hrynick Tabitha, Thien Mai Thi My, Huynh Tuyen, Huynh Phuong, Nguyen Phuong, Thow Anne-Marie
Abstract
AbstractGlobal trade has shaped food systems over centuries, but modern trade agreements are hastening these changes and making them more complex, with implications for public health and nutrition transition. This study aimed to understand the impact of the 2018 Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) on the policy space for public health nutrition in Vietnam. We conducted comparative document review and key informant interviews, and our analysis drew on a framework of policy space and the theory of advocacy coalitions. We identified 10 CPTPP sections with potential public health nutrition implications; and 50 Vietnamese policies relevant to nutrition having one or more tensions with one or more CPTPP sections. A majority of policy tensions were in sections of the CPTPP relating to technical barriers to trade and government procurement; most tensions related to protecting policy-making from vested interests. Different groups of policy actors hold different beliefs and interests on these issues, and therefore promote different framings and policy approaches. We identified two advocacy coalitions working very separately on issues affecting nutrition policy space: a trade coalition holding the policy position that free trade improves nutrition by default; and a nutrition coalition holding the policy position that nutrition should be explicitly considered in trade policy. The policy space for nutrition in Vietnam has important potential constraints through written policy, and the trade and nutrition coalitions will need to interact more regularly and constructively in order to foresee where these tensions will arise in practice, and create plans for their mitigation. This study adds to global evidence of free trade agreement impacts on nutrition policy space, and we extend previous work by explaining these actor groupings in the policy space through the theory of advocacy coalitions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science,Development,Food Science
Reference48 articles.
1. Barlow, P., McKee, M., Basu, S., & Stuckler, D. (2017). The health impact of trade and investment agreements: A quantitative systematic review and network co-citation analysis. Globalization and Health, 13(1), 13. 2. Baulch, B. (2016). Explaining catch-up in human development: A political economy comparisons on the Philippines and Viet Nam Since 1986. The Kellogg Institute for International Studies: Working Paper, 412. 3. Béné, C., Kawarazuka, N., Pham, H., Haan, Sd., Tuyen, H., Thi, D. T., & Dang, C. (2020). Policy framing and crisis narratives around food safety in Vietnam. Environment and Planning e: Nature and Space, 4(3), 985–1009. 4. Béné, C., Oosterveer, P., Lamotte, L., Brouwer, I. D., de Haan, S., Prager, S. D., Talsma, E. F., & Khoury, C. K. (2019). When food systems meet sustainability – Current narratives and implications for actions. World Development, 113, 116–130. 5. Buse, K., Aftab, W., Akhter, S., Phuong, L. B., Chemli, H., Dahal, M., Feroz, A., Hofiani, S., Pradhan, N. A., & Anwar, I. (2020). The state of diet-related NCD policies in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, Tunisia and Vietnam: A comparative assessment that introduces a ‘policy cube’approach. Health Policy and Planning, 35(5), 503–521.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|