Abstract
AbstractSmall-scale farmers make up the majority of farmers worldwide yet experience particularly high rates of food insecurity. A growing body of literature explores pathways to food and nutrition security among small-scale farmers but has yet to reach consensus on the most effective pathways (e.g., crop specialization for market sale versus on-farm crop diversification for home consumption) to improve livelihoods. Using structural equation modelling (SEM) based on data drawn from the 2015/16 Uganda National Panel Survey, this study considers how farm and household characteristics including gender, age, education, farm size, region, and off-farm income relate to market engagement (farm sales, market purchases) and on-farm crop diversity (Simpson’s diversity). We then further examine how market engagement and on-farm crop diversity relate to household livelihood outcomes including dietary diversity and food security (number of food secure months). Findings suggest that both higher levels of market engagement and on-farm crop diversity are associated with increased dietary diversity. Higher levels of crop diversity—whether for market sale or for self-consumption—are strongly associated with improved food security. Market engagement is positively associated with increased dietary diversity, and this association is particularly strong for market purchases. Together, these findings highlight the potential for both market-based strategies and on-farm crop diversity to contribute to food security goals in Uganda, providing further evidence that these strategies can be complementary.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science,Development,Food Science
Reference70 articles.
1. Adjognon, G. S., Soest, D., & Guthoff, J. (2021). Reducing hunger with payments for environmental services ( PES ): experimental evidence from burkina faso. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 103(3), 831–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12150
2. Ballard, T. J., Kepple, A. W., & Cafiero, C. (2013). The food insecurity experience scale: Developing a global standard for monitoring hunger worldwide [Technical Paper]. FAO. http://www.fao.org/economic/ess/essfs/voices/en/
3. Bellon, M. R., Kotu, B. H., Azzarri, C., & Caracciolo, F. (2020). To diversify or not to diversify, that is the question. Pursuing agricultural development for smallholder farmers in marginal areas of Ghana. World Development, 125, 104682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104682
4. Bilinsky, P., & Swindale, A. (2010). Months of Adequate Household Food Provisioning (MAHFP) for Measurement of Household Food Access: Indicator Guide (v.4). FHI 360/Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project (FANTA). https://www.fantaproject.org/sites/default/files/resources/MAHFP_June_2010_ENGLISH_v4.pdf
5. Bliege Bird, R., & Bird, D. W. (2021). Climate, landscape diversity, and food sovereignty in arid Australia: The firestick farming hypothesis. American Journal of Human Biology, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23527
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献