Sharing decision-making tools for pest management may foster implementation of Integrated Pest Management

Author:

Rossi VittorioORCID,Caffi TitoORCID,Salotti IreneORCID,Fedele GiorgiaORCID

Abstract

AbstractAgriculture needs to reduce its current dependence toward pesticides while reducing crop losses caused by pests and ensuring food security; Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is considered the most appropriate approach to achieve the goal. More specifically, growers should use tools that enable informed decisions on whether and when crop protection is needed, and which methods should be used. These tools include risk algorithms, decision rules, intervention thresholds, and decision support systems (DSSs), collectively named decision tools (DTs). A large number of DTs have been developed and made available to advisors and farmers, mainly through Internet-based systems. The adoption rate of these systems, however, has been low because of technical limitations and farmer perceptions. Fragmentation of the DTs offered, poor local implementation, and restriction to particular users are among the causes for low adoption. If properly mobilised, the use and effects of DTs could substantially be increased. Sharing of IPM DTs has a strong potential for providing wider access to the existing knowledge, for fostering IPM implementation, and for supporting plant health policies. In this article, we outline an overall approach to develop a web-based platform, in which DTs are shared and made widely available. Such a platform can include a range of ready-to-use DTs, i.e. DTs which are currently available, that have been field-validated, and which are already being used in some agricultural contexts. The platform also provides open, full documentation of DTs, makes DTs available for validation and adaptation in different agricultural contexts, and makes DTs easily available for multiple kinds of end-users involved in IPM (farmers, IPM experts, public and private information and service providers, and policy makers). We also consider how DT sharing can reduce both the technological and behavioural limitations of existing plant health management systems.

Funder

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Agronomy and Crop Science,Development,Food Science

Reference74 articles.

1. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939

2. Ascough, J., Mcmaster, G. S., Dunn, G. H., & Andales, A. A. (2010). The GPFARM DS for agroecosystem sustainability: The past, future, and lessons learned. In T. F. D.A. Swayne, W. Yang, A.A. Voinov, A. Rizzoli (Ed.), Environmental Modeling International Conference Proceedings. International Modeling and Environmental Software Society, Modelling for Environment’s Sake.

3. Barzman, M., Bàrberi, P., Birch, A. N. E., Boonekamp, P., Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, S., Graf, B., et al. (2015). Eight principles of integrated pest management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35(4), 1199–1215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0327-9

4. Been, T. H., Consiglio, A. B., Evans, N., Gouache, D., Gutsche, V., Jensen, J. E., et al. (2009). Review of New technologies critical to effective implementation of Decision Support Systems (DSS’s) and Farm Management Systems (FMS’s). Endure, (March), 128.

5. Bentley, J. W., Castaño-Zapata, J., & Andrews, K. L. (1995). World integrated pathogen and pest management and sustainable agriculture in the developing world. Advances in Plant Pathology, 11, 250–271.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Unravelling the use of artificial intelligence in management of insect pests;Smart Agricultural Technology;2024-08

2. Integrating Biopesticides and Botanicals for Sustainable and Eco-Friendly Crop Protection Strategies;Advances in Environmental Engineering and Green Technologies;2024-06-28

3. Economic Viability of Smart Pest Management Practices;Advances in Environmental Engineering and Green Technologies;2024-06-28

4. Environmental and Economic Performance of Greenhouse Cropping in the Mediterranean Basin: Lessons Learnt from a Cross-Country Comparison;Sustainability;2024-05-25

5. Sustainable Agriculture and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs);Practice, Progress, and Proficiency in Sustainability;2024-04-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3