Abstract
AbstractGoats fulfil a central role in food and nutritional security across Africa with over half of households owning or rearing goats in rural areas. However, goat performance is poor and mortality high. This study assessed the nutritional quality of commonly used feeds and proposes feed-baskets to enhance goat nutrition and health. Feeds were collected from 11 areas within the Central District of Botswana, and macronutrient analyses were conducted, including crude protein, fibre fractions, ash, and metabolizable energy (ME). Forage nutrition was compared across seasons and soil types. Additionally, seasonal supplementation trials were conducted to evaluate consumption rates of various supplements, including crop residues, pellets, Lablab purpureus, and Dichrostachys cinerea. Each supplement was provided ad libitum for a 24-h period, and consumption rates determined. Findings revealed significant differences in nutrition among various feed sources, across seasons, and in relation to soil types (p < 0.001). Consumption rates of supplements were higher during the dry season, possibly due to reduced forage availability. Supplement consumption rates varied across supplement type, with crop residues accounting for approximately 1% of dry matter intake, compared to up to 45% for pellets, 13% for L. purpureus, and 15% for D. cinerea. While wet season feed baskets exhibited higher ME values compared to dry-season feed-baskets, the relative impact of supplementation was more pronounced during the dry season. These results highlight the potential for optimizing goat diets through improved grazing and browsing management, especially during the reduced nutritional availability in the dry season in Botswana. Such diet optimisation may improve goat health and productivity, which may positively impact the food and financial security of smallholders by providing both increased yields and increased resilience. Importantly, rural communities can experience some of the lowest food security levels in the region. The interventions explored in this study utilise natural capital, often freely available, which can be deployed through existing husbandry systems, potentially making them accessible and practical to smallholders.
Funder
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference57 articles.
1. AFRC. (1993). Energy and Protein Requirements of Ruminants. Wallingford, UK: Agricultural Food and Research Council Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients.
2. Aganga, A., & Autlwetse, M. (2000). Utilization of sorghum forage, millet forage, veldt grass and buffel grass by tswana sheep and goats when fed lablab purpureus L. as protein supplement. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 13, 1127–1132. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2000.1127
3. Aganga, A. A., Omphile, U. J., & Mojaditlhogo, N. (2005). Composition and digestibility of indigeneous grasses in the hardveld of Botswana during the dry season. Archivos de Zootecnia, 54(208), 587–598.
4. Bolowe, M. A., Thutwa, K., Monau, P. I., Malejane, C., & Kgwatalala, P. M. (2022). Production characteristics and management practices of indigenous Tswana sheep in southern districts of Botswana. Animals, 12(7), 830. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12070830
5. Burgess, J. (2005). Country Profile - Botswana. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy.