Author:
Wang Erpeng,An Ning,Gao Zhifeng,Kiprop Emmanuel,Geng Xianhui
Abstract
AbstractConsumer behavior changes differently in emergencies. Understanding consumer food stockpiling behavior during COVID-19 pandemic can provide critical information for governments and policymakers to adjust inventory and response strategies. This paper analyzed consumer food stockpiling behavior, including the change of food reserve scale and willingness to pay for fresh food reserves in COVID-19. Our paper shows that the scale of food reserve extends from 3.37 to 7.37 days after the outbreak of COVID-19; if available, consumers on average are willing to pay 18.14 yuan (60.47%) premium for fresh products reserves. The result shows that food stockpiling behavior is fueled by a set of multiple motivations and subjective risk perception. Female, high education level and high-income consumers were more likely to reserve larger scale food reserves, but consumers’ willingness to pay for fresh food reserves is determined by income. This study was conducted when new infection cases continued to rise in the world. The story of food stockpiling during the COVID-19 pandemic in China is similar with the rest of world. Consumer stockpiling behavior in China can also be expanded to other countries to predict the change of food demand and understand more about consumer preferences in emergencies.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science,Development,Food Science
Reference37 articles.
1. Bishop, R. C., & Heberlein, T. A. (1990). The contingent valuation method: In Johnson, RL and Johnson, GV (eds.), Economic Valuation of Natural Resources. (pp. 81–104). Westview Press.
2. Bloomberg. (2012). Update on city action and response to hurricane Sandy. https://www1.nyc.gov/office-of-the-mayor/news/385-12/mayor-bloomberg-newyorkers-city-response-hurricane-sandy
3. Bohm, P. (1972). Estimating demand for public goods: an experiment. European Economic Review, 3, 111–130.
4. Callen, M., Isaqzadeh, M., Long, J. D., & Sprenger, C. (2014). Violence and risk preference: experimental evidenc from Afghanistan. American Economic Review, 104(1), 123–148.
5. Chuang, Y., & Schechter, L. (2015). Stability of experimental and survey measures of risk, time, and social preferences: a review and some new results. Journal of Development Economics, 117, 151–170.
Cited by
162 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献