Consumer food stockpiling behavior and willingness to pay for food reserves in COVID-19

Author:

Wang Erpeng,An Ning,Gao Zhifeng,Kiprop Emmanuel,Geng Xianhui

Abstract

AbstractConsumer behavior changes differently in emergencies. Understanding consumer food stockpiling behavior during COVID-19 pandemic can provide critical information for governments and policymakers to adjust inventory and response strategies. This paper analyzed consumer food stockpiling behavior, including the change of food reserve scale and willingness to pay for fresh food reserves in COVID-19. Our paper shows that the scale of food reserve extends from 3.37 to 7.37 days after the outbreak of COVID-19; if available, consumers on average are willing to pay 18.14 yuan (60.47%) premium for fresh products reserves. The result shows that food stockpiling behavior is fueled by a set of multiple motivations and subjective risk perception. Female, high education level and high-income consumers were more likely to reserve larger scale food reserves, but consumers’ willingness to pay for fresh food reserves is determined by income. This study was conducted when new infection cases continued to rise in the world. The story of food stockpiling during the COVID-19 pandemic in China is similar with the rest of world. Consumer stockpiling behavior in China can also be expanded to other countries to predict the change of food demand and understand more about consumer preferences in emergencies.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Agronomy and Crop Science,Development,Food Science

Reference37 articles.

1. Bishop, R. C., & Heberlein, T. A. (1990). The contingent valuation method: In Johnson, RL and Johnson, GV (eds.), Economic Valuation of Natural Resources. (pp. 81–104). Westview Press.

2. Bloomberg. (2012). Update on city action and response to hurricane Sandy. https://www1.nyc.gov/office-of-the-mayor/news/385-12/mayor-bloomberg-newyorkers-city-response-hurricane-sandy

3. Bohm, P. (1972). Estimating demand for public goods: an experiment. European Economic Review, 3, 111–130.

4. Callen, M., Isaqzadeh, M., Long, J. D., & Sprenger, C. (2014). Violence and risk preference: experimental evidenc from Afghanistan. American Economic Review, 104(1), 123–148.

5. Chuang, Y., & Schechter, L. (2015). Stability of experimental and survey measures of risk, time, and social preferences: a review and some new results. Journal of Development Economics, 117, 151–170.

Cited by 162 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3