Data-Seeking Behaviour in the Social Sciences

Author:

Krämer ThomasORCID,Papenmeier Andrea,Carevic Zeljko,Kern Dagmar,Mathiak Brigitte

Abstract

AbstractPurpose Publishing research data for reuse has become good practice in recent years. However, not much is known on how researchers actually find said data. In this exploratory study, we observe the information-seeking behaviour of social scientists searching for research data to reveal impediments and identify opportunities for data search infrastructure.Methods We asked 12 participants to search for research data and observed them in their natural environment. The sessions were recorded. Afterwards, we conducted semi-structured interviews to get a thorough understanding of their way of searching. From the recordings, we extracted the interaction behaviour of the participants and analysed the spoken words both during the search task and the interview by creating affinity diagrams.Results We found that literature search is more closely intertwined with dataset search than previous literature suggests. Both the search itself and the relevance assessment are very complex, and many different strategies are employed, including the creatively “misuse” of existing tools, since no appropriate tools exist or are unknown to the participants.Conclusion Many of the issues we found relate directly or indirectly to the application of the FAIR principles, but some, like a greater need for dataset search literacy, go beyond that. Both infrastructure and tools offered for dataset search could be tailored more tightly to the observed work processes, particularly by offering more interconnectivity between datasets, literature, and other relevant materials.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference44 articles.

1. Athukorala, K., Hoggan, E., Lehtiö, A., Ruotsalo, T., Jacucci, G.: Information-seeking behaviors of computer scientists: Challenges for electronic literature search tools. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 50(1), 1–11 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14505001041

2. Bates, M.J.: Where should the person stop and the information search interface start? Inf. Process. Manage. 26(5), 575–591 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(90)90103-9

3. Belkin, N.J., et al.: Interaction with texts: Information retrieval as information seeking behavior. Inf. Retr. 93, 55–66 (1993)

4. Bhattacherjee, A.: Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices. (2012). URL: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=oa_textbooks

5. Borlund, P.: The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Information research 8(3), (2003)

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3