Abstract
AbstractPurpose Publishing research data for reuse has become good practice in recent years. However, not much is known on how researchers actually find said data. In this exploratory study, we observe the information-seeking behaviour of social scientists searching for research data to reveal impediments and identify opportunities for data search infrastructure.Methods We asked 12 participants to search for research data and observed them in their natural environment. The sessions were recorded. Afterwards, we conducted semi-structured interviews to get a thorough understanding of their way of searching. From the recordings, we extracted the interaction behaviour of the participants and analysed the spoken words both during the search task and the interview by creating affinity diagrams.Results We found that literature search is more closely intertwined with dataset search than previous literature suggests. Both the search itself and the relevance assessment are very complex, and many different strategies are employed, including the creatively “misuse” of existing tools, since no appropriate tools exist or are unknown to the participants.Conclusion Many of the issues we found relate directly or indirectly to the application of the FAIR principles, but some, like a greater need for dataset search literacy, go beyond that. Both infrastructure and tools offered for dataset search could be tailored more tightly to the observed work processes, particularly by offering more interconnectivity between datasets, literature, and other relevant materials.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences
Reference44 articles.
1. Athukorala, K., Hoggan, E., Lehtiö, A., Ruotsalo, T., Jacucci, G.: Information-seeking behaviors of computer scientists: Challenges for electronic literature search tools. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 50(1), 1–11 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14505001041
2. Bates, M.J.: Where should the person stop and the information search interface start? Inf. Process. Manage. 26(5), 575–591 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(90)90103-9
3. Belkin, N.J., et al.: Interaction with texts: Information retrieval as information seeking behavior. Inf. Retr. 93, 55–66 (1993)
4. Bhattacherjee, A.: Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices. (2012). URL: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=oa_textbooks
5. Borlund, P.: The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Information research 8(3), (2003)
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献