Feasibility and benefits of home initiation of subcutaneous apomorphine infusion for patients with Parkinson’s disease: the APOKADO study

Author:

Zagnoli Fabien,Leblanc Amélie,Viakhireva-Dovganyuk Irina,Delabrousse-Mayoux Jean-Philippe,Pouyet Alain,Ziegler Marc,Sogni Laura,Patat Marie,Bouillot Régis,Vérin MarcORCID,Arhire Andrei,Barres Philippe,Blondiaux Maxime,Bouffeteau Jean-Claude,Brandel Jean-Philippe,Carel Christophe,Castelnovo Giovanni,Coustans Marc,Courault Lucie,Crauser Christian,Degaey Isabelle,Degos Bertrand,Delabrousse Jean-Philippe,Denis Béatrice,Dourneau Marie-Claude,Duretete Arnaud,Feve Jean-Marc François,Follin Erika,Gugenheim Michel,Hubsch Cécile,Patte Karsenti Nathalie,Louchart Pierre,Massengo Serge,Mejias José,Monteiro Homero,Muh Philippe,Pedespan Bernard,Sattler Virginie,Sevin Mathieu,Tir Mélissa,Tirel Badets Anne,Verin Marc,Viakhireva Irina,Vidry Elisabeth,Wiart Jean-Charles,

Abstract

AbstractContinuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI) is used to treat patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) who are experiencing motor fluctuations. However, the need to initiate this treatment during a hospital stay may restrict patients’ access to it. To assess the feasibility and benefits of initiating CSAI in the patient’s own home. A French prospective multicenter longitudinal observational study (APOKADO) among patients with PD who required subcutaneous apomorphine, comparing in-hospital versus home initiation. Clinical status was assessed according to the Hoehn and Yahr score), the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part III, and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. We assessed patients’ quality of life with the 8-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire, rated the improvement in their clinical status on the 7-point Clinical Global Impression–Improvement scale, recorded adverse events, and ran a cost–benefit analysis. 145 patients with motor fluctuations were included in 29 centers (office and hospital). Of these, 106 (74%) were initiated onto CSAI at home, and 38 (26%) in hospital. At inclusion, the two groups were comparable for all demographic and PD characteristics. After 6 months, quality of life, adverse events and early dropout rates were similarly rare-across the two groups. Patients in the home group improved more quickly their quality of life and became more autonomous in managing the device than those in the hospital group, and their care costed less. This study shows that home (versus in-hospital) initiation of CSAI is feasible, improves patients’ quality of life more quickly, with the same level of tolerance. It is also less expensive. This finding should make it easier for patients to access this treatment in the future.

Funder

ADELIA MEDICAL

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Biological Psychiatry,Psychiatry and Mental health,Neurology (clinical),Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3