Abstract
AbstractMotivated by the increasing interest in machine learning algorithms for data-driven applications in agri-food addressing sustainability issues and by the ongoing discussion on the interpretability and sustainability of such algorithms, we compare congruently the performance of some state-of-the-art techniques and a new version (here proposed for the first time) of Co-Active Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System, equipped with fractional regularization (CANFIS-T for short). To this end, we consider two case studies retrieved from the literature and dealing with two approaches for sustainability development, i.e. ex-ante Life Cycle Assessment and Supply Chain Operations Reference in the agri-food context. Such approaches are set in a data-driven framework and completed by the above-mentioned machine learning techniques. The state-of-the-art techniques from the relevant literature are the ensemble ANFIS, Radial Basis Function Network and Decision Tree. The techniques are compared from the computational, interpretability and energy standpoints. From a formal perspective, we prove what negatively affects the accuracy of ensemble ANFIS. On the basis of the performed experiments, we notice that except for the ensemble ANFIS, all the approaches can be regarded as sustainable, with energy savings over 99%, while only CANFIS-T keeps both good accuracy and interpretability (with up to 4 rules) when the number of input and output variables gets large.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献