Abstract
AbstractLectures are a commonly used teaching method in higher education, but there is significant debate about the relative merits of different classroom practices. Various classroom observation tools have been developed to try to give insight into these practices, beyond the simple dichotomy of “traditional lecturing versus active learning”. Here we review of a selection of classroom observation protocols from an ethological perspective and describe how this informed the development of a new protocol, FILL+. We demonstrate that FILL+ can be applied reliably by undergraduate students after minimal training. We analysed a sample of 208 lecture recordings from Mathematics, Physics, and Veterinary Medicine and found a wide variety of classroom practices, e.g. on average lecturers spent 2.1% (± 2.6%) of the time asking questions, and 79.3% (± 19%) of the lecture talking, but individuals varied considerably. The FILL+ protocol has the potential to be widely used, both in research on effective teaching practices, and in informing discussion of pedagogical approaches within institutions and disciplines.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Bradbury, N.A. (2016). Attention span during lectures: 8 seconds, 10 minutes, or more?. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(4), 509–513. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00109.2016. ISSN:15221229.
2. Chinnery, S., Hughes, K., & MacKay, J.R.D. (2018). The active lecture? Exploring engagement in the veterinary lecture through the PORTAAL tool. In VetEd: international symposium of the veterinary schools council.
3. Copeland, H.L., & et al. (2000). Successful lecturing. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 15 (6), 366–371. ISSN:0884-8734. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.06439.x. http://www.pmc/articles/PMC1495460/?report=abstracthttp://www.pmc/articles/PMC1495460/?report=abstract.
4. Duell, O.K., & et al. (1992). Wait-time in college classes taken by education majors. Research in Higher Education, 33(4), 483–495. ISSN: 03610365. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00973768.
5. Eddy, S.L., Converse, M., & Wenderoth, M.P. (2015). PORTAAL: A classroom observation tool assessing evidence-based teaching practices for active learning in large science, technology, engineering, and mathematics classes. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 2(14). Ed. by Jeff Schinske, ar23. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-06-0095. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26033871.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献