Abstract
AbstractNorth Eastern English differs from Standard English with respect to agreement: According to theNorthern Subject Rule,3sgagreement marking (verbal -s) occurs on verbs in clauses with non-3sgsubjects provided that they are not personal pronouns adjacent to the verb. However, data from theDiachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside Englishshows that verbal-salso does not occur with non-adjacent personal pronouns subjects in contemporary North Eastern English. I argue that verbal-swith non-pronominal non-3sgsubjects follows from two conceptual assumptions: firstly, the requirement to order feature-driven elementary operations and secondly, splitting up$$\upvarphi $$φ-Agree into two separate operations (i.e., person and number Agree). The difference in agreement between North Eastern English and Standard English stems from the different ordering of features on T. In Standard English, person and number probes are ordered before the structure building feature, which triggers movement. In the North Eastern English order, however, the structure-building feature intervenes between the two probe features. The full DP/pronoun split is explained by different kinds of movement: In the case of a full DP, subject movement to Spec/TP bleeds number agreement and verbal-semerges, while pronominal subjects remain in the c-command domain of T because they head-move to T.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)