Fidesz, liberal democracy and the fundamental law in Hungary

Author:

Gomez Gabriel,Leunig Sven

Abstract

AbstractAfter its landslide victories of 2010, 2014 and 2018, Fidesz has introduced numerous institutional changes in the Hungarian political system. The academic research has emphasized the illiberal and antidemocratic character of these reforms, and the populist ideology of the party has been widely considered as the underlying force behind them. This study analyzes the most important reform that Fidesz has undertaken: the new Fundamental Law, enacted in 2012. We examine whether this change can be regarded as a violation of liberal democratic principles, and, if that is the case, whether it can be linked to the populist character of Fidesz. We found that some of the most criticized dispositions of the newly enacted constitution cannot be regarded as violations of liberal democratic principles, whereas other changes clearly constitute attacks to the foundations of Hungarian democracy, mainly affecting the separation of powers and the civil rights of minorities, These findings are largely consistent with the effects of populist governments on democracy as documented in the literature.

Funder

Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference57 articles.

1. Ádám, Zoltán, and András Bozóki. 2016. State and Faith: Right-wing Populism and Nationalized Religion in Hungary. Intersections 2:98–122.

2. Ágh, Attila. 2013. The Triple Crisis in Hungary: The “Backsliding” of Hungarian Democracy after Twenty Years. Romanian Journal of Political Science 13:25–51.

3. Ágh, Attila, Jürgen Dieringer, and Frank Bönker. 2020. Hungary Report: Sustainable Governance Indicators. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.

4. Akkerman, Tjitske. 2017. Populist Parties in Power and Their Impact on Liberal Democracies in Western Europe. In Political Populism: A Handbook, ed. Reinhard Heinisch, Christina Holtz-Bacha, and Oscar Mazzoleni, 169–180. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

5. Albertazzi, Daniele, and Sean Mueller. 2013. Populism and liberal democracy: Populists in government in Austria, Italy, Poland and Switzerland. Government and Opposition 48:343–371.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Populisms, Constitutions, Constitutional Courts, and Constitutional Democracy;Populism and Contemporary Democracy in Europe;2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3