Who shapes the energy transition? National regulatory styles and societal involvement in renewable energy policy

Author:

Brendler ViktoriaORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis paper contributes a comparative perspective on societal involvement in the energy transition that considers (i) both the policymaking and the policy implementation stage as well as (ii) contribution opportunities for different types of actors (corporate actors vs. the public). Contrasting the concept of persistent national regulatory styles with the concept of a shift towards new modes of governance and/or participation, I examine societal involvement in national renewable energy policy following the formulation of the European 20-20-20 targets in Spring of 2007. My main research question is whether the condition of high reform pressure lead to a change in sector-specific regulatory traditions. In a comparative case study, I highlight (1) a corporatist setting with new players (Germany), (2) a large-scale public consultation in the shadow of established interests (France), (3) a liberal approach building on agreements (Netherlands) as well as (4) repeated consultations with paternalistic decision-making (United Kingdom). My results indicate both a persistence of overall regulatory styles as well as limited additions to involved actors and/or utilised formats. Societal involvement in policymaking proved rather inconsequential in most cases under study. Regarding societal contributions to policy implementation, convergence tendencies towards a two-pronged approach, addressing both corporate actors and the public, were observable despite the persistence of differential regulatory styles.

Funder

Universität Osnabrück

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference142 articles.

1. AEP, Association of Electricity Producers, British Wind Energy Association (BWEA), Micropower Council, Renewable Energy Association (REA), Scottish Renewables Forum, and UK Business Council for Sustainable Energy (BCSE). 2007. Joint statement on the Renewables Obligation. http://www.bwea.com/pdf/070105RO_Joint_Statement_Jan_2007.pdf. Accessed 13 July 2007.

2. Agterbosch, Susanne, Walter Vermeulen, and Pieter Glasbergen. 2004. Implementation of wind energy in the Netherlands: The importance of the social-institutional setting. Energy Policy 32(18):2049–2066. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00180-0.

3. Arentsen, Maarten J. 2008. The Netherlands: Muddling through in the Dutch delta. In Promoting sustainable electricity in Europe: Challenging the path dependence of dominant energy systems, ed. William M. Lafferty, Audun Ruud, 45–72. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

4. Assemblée Nationale. 2010. N° 2449 tome II. Rapport sur le projet de loi, adopté par le Sénat, portant engagement national pour l’environnement (n°1965).

5. Bauer, Christian. 2015. Stiftung von Legitimation oder Partizipationsverflechtungsfalle: Welche Folgen hat die Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung beim Stromnetzausbau? der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management 8:273–293.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3