Next stop carbon dioxide removal? German climate policies and the risky road to negative emission technologies

Author:

Haas TobiasORCID,Schoppek Dorothea ElenaORCID

Abstract

AbstractBoth the global and the German climate targets are ambitious given recent emission reduction rates. In addition to emission reduction measures, carbon dioxide removal has been increasingly discussed recently and initial measures have been developed to potentially scale-up carbon removals in order to meet net zero targets. In this article, we undertake a political economy-based analysis of the historical development and structural conditions of German climate policy measures and their enabling role for the emergence and strengthening of carbon dioxide removal policy options. We refer to regulation theory and the Modell Deutschland approach and argue that within this model the concept of ecological modernization has been established as the dominant approach to regulate society-nature relations. In light of the ambitious climate policy goals, such as net zero by 2045, ecological modernization reaches its current limits and must be recalibrated. Against this background, we conclude by discussing the risk of mitigation deterrence associated with carbon dioxide removals and considering alternative pathways, such as degrowth, to social ecological transformation.

Funder

Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ), Forschungsinstitut für Nachhaltigkeit (RIFS)

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference75 articles.

1. Aglietta, Michel. 1979. A theory of capitalist regulation: the US experience. London and New York: Verso.

2. Agora Energiewende. 2020. Die Energiewende im Stromsektor: Stand der Dinge 2019. Rückblick auf die wesentlichen Entwicklungen sowie Ausblick auf 2020

3. Agora Energiewende. 2022. Die Energiewende in Deutschland: Stand der Dinge 2021. Rückblick auf die wesentlichen Entwicklungen sowie Ausblick auf 2022

4. Aiginger, Karl. 2019. Industriepolitik mit gesellschaftlichen Zielen verbinden – systematischer Ansatz statt Uraltkontroverse. Wirtschaftsdienst 2019(2):101–105. ZBW – Leibnitz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-019-2402-3.

5. Archer, Margaret. 1995. Realist social theory: the morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Mit CCS zur Klimaneutralität?;PROKLA. Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft;2024-08-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3