Opportunities and limitations for social justice in Germany’s climate adaptation policy

Author:

Teebken JuliaORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn the quest for (more) effective adaptation, demands are rising in adaptation policy practitioners to address systemic injustices. In practice, however, adaptation incrementalism dominates, i.e. small-scale, reactive solutions, especially as it relates to addressing vulnerable populations. Germany is exemplary of these tensions. Little research investigates the larger context factors which impede the root causes of vulnerability from being addressed, how to transition away from incrementalism, and the role environmental agencies can play in this. Applying historical materialist policy analysis, the article follows a three-step approach which examines context, actors, and processes. The context analysis demonstrates how effective means for social redistribution were reduced since the mid-1980s in Germany’s capitalist welfare state. This corresponds with heightened social vulnerability to climate change. The actor landscape is diversifying. In the past, social policy actors (and tasks) were underrepresented but are becoming more important. The policy process indicates a greater focus on vulnerable populations. Yet, the understanding of the structural root causes of peoples’ vulnerability and financial resources of the policy field remain limited. This corresponds with informatory instruments of shallow depth. An improved root cause analytic coupled with new alliances and policy mixes are a good starting point towards greater social justice in adaptation.

Funder

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference83 articles.

1. Ajulo, Oluwadunsin, Jason Von-Meding, and Patrick Tang. 2020. Upending the status quo through transformative adaptation: a systematic literature review. Progress in Disaster Science 6:100103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100103.

2. Bach, Stefan, Martin Beznoska and Viktor Steiner. 2016. Who Bears the Tax Burden in Germany? Tax Structure Slightly Progressive, DIW Economic Bulletin, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 6(51/52), pages 601-608.

3. Beermann,  A.-C., Schrems, I., Hünecke, K., Katja Schumacher, and Förster, H. (2021). Verteilungswirkungen eines fortschreitenden Klimawandels. Forum Ökologisch Soziale Marktwirtschaft (FÖS). https://foes.de/publikatonen/2021/2021-09_FOES_Verteilungswirkungen_eines_fortschreitenden_Klimawandels.pdf. Accessed 10 Jun 2023.

4. Berrang-Ford, Lea, A.R. Siders, Alexandra Lesnikowski, Alexandra Paige Fischer, Max W. Callaghan, Neal R. Haddaway, et al, 2021. A systematic global stocktake of evidence on human adaptation to climate change. Nature Climate Change 11(11):989–1000. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01170-y.

5. Biesbroek, G. Robbert, Rob J. Swart, Timothy R. Carter, Caroline Cowan, Thomas Henrichs, Hanna Mela, Michael D. Morecroft, and Daniela Rey. 2010. Europe adapts to climate change: comparing national adaptation strategies. Glob Environ Chang 20(3):440–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.03.005.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3