The ‘glass ceiling’ of Germany’s socio-ecological transformation: Citizen, expert, and local stakeholder perspectives on responsibility for change
-
Published:2024-06
Issue:2
Volume:34
Page:273-293
-
ISSN:1430-6387
-
Container-title:Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Z Politikwiss
Author:
Kreinin Halliki,Mamut Pia,Fuchs Doris
Abstract
AbstractThe IPCC (2022) underscores the urgent need to transform economic and social systems to stay within the ~1.5 °C warming threshold, with the pressure placed on states to lead the processes of transformation. Germany’s market economy is currently neither socially nor ecologically sustainable, requiring a socio-ecological transformation towards sustainable consumption and production systems. As the imperatives of the modern democratic welfare state require high levels of material welfare, economic growth and legitimation through (over)consumption, there is currently a “glass ceiling” to any such transformation. Through a combination of empirical research methods, including 11 expert interviews, a gamified citizen workshop with 22 citizens, and a local stakeholder workshop with 27 stakeholders, this paper explores the readiness and perspectives of German citizens, experts, and local stakeholders for a socio-ecological transformation. The findings highlight the contradictory role given to the state in the transformation, the difficulties of transforming “imperial modes of living”, and the collective evasion of responsibility, which suggests a “glass ceiling” to transforming the German market economy into a genuinely social and ecological model.
Funder
Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ), Forschungsinstitut für Nachhaltigkeit (RIFS)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Aigner, E., C. Görg, V. Madner, A. Muhar, A. Posch, K.W. Steininger, L. Bohunovsky, J. Essletzbichler, K. Fischer, H. Frey, W. Haas, M. Haderer, J. Hofbauer, B. Hollaus, A. Jany, L. Keller, A. Krisch, K. Kubeczko, M. Miess, M. Ornetzeder, M. Penker, M. Pichler, U. Schneider, B. Smetschka, R. Steurer, N. Svanda, H. Theine, M. Weber, and H. Wieser. 2023. Summary for Policymakers. In APCC Special Report: Strukturen für ein klimafreundliches Leben, ed. C. Görg, V. Madner, A. Muhar, A. Novy, A. Posch, K.W. Steininger, and E. Aigner, 19–33. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66497-1_2. 2. Altenburg, T., C. Rosendahl, A. Stamm, and C. von Drachenfels. 2008. Industrial policy—A key element of the social and ecological market economy 3. Amel, E., C. Manning, B. Scott, and S. Koger. 2017. Beyond the roots of human inaction: Fostering collective effort toward ecosystem conservation. Science 356:275–279. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal1931. 4. Ayres, R.U., and B. Warr. 2009. The economic growth engine: how energy and work drive material prosperity. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar. 5. Beck, U. 1986. Risikogesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
|
|