Optimizing Measurement Potential in Mental Health Clinical Practice: The Canadian Personal Recovery Outcome Measure (C-PROM) study

Author:

Barbic Skye P.,Ow NikkiORCID,Kidd Sean A.,Backman Catherine L.,Mathias Steve,Honer William G.,McKenzie Kwame

Abstract

AbstractThere is an increasing commitment to “Personal Recovery” as the desired outcome for mental health rehabilitation, yet there is little agreement about how to measure it. The purpose of this study was to develop a method of measuring recovery in community-dwelling people with mental health concerns. We describe a four-phase process, informed by guidelines for (patient-reported outcome measure) PROM development described by the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust, the Food and Drug Administration, and the International Society for Quality of Life Research, on how to quantify recovery in mental health care. The approach includes an iterative mixed methods process, guided by Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT), to develop the Canadian Personal Recovery Outcome Measure (C-PROM) for adults receiving mental health services. In Phases 1 and 2, 40 new items were generated by people with schizophrenia. In Phase 3, psychometric analysis and cognitive interviewing suggested that the item set be reduced to 30 items. Phase 4 (n = 575) showed good overall fit of the C-PROM items to the Rasch model (χ2 = 163, df = 130, p = .05), no item misfit, high reliability (rp = 0.92), an ordered response scale structure, high correlation between logit and scale scores (0.92) and no item bias for gender, age, or diagnosis. This study provided evidence for the C-PROM as a measure of personal recovery for people with mental health concerns. The measurement model underpinning this set of items has potential to support clinical relevance of scale scores, advancing an evidence-based approach to mental health rehabilitation practice and outcomes.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference75 articles.

1. Aaronson NK, Alonso J, Nurnham A, et al. Assessing health status and quality of life instruments. Quality of Life Research. 2002;11:193-205.

2. Adepoju O, Lin SH, Mileski M, et al. Mental health status and healthcare utilization among community dwelling older adults. Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England). Apr 27 2018:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2018.1466030

3. Amarneh J. Scaling the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) Using the Rasch Measurement Model. presented at: Virgina Henson International Nursing Library. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2003; Indianapolis

4. Andrich D. Rasch models for measurement. Sage Publications; 1988.

5. Andrich, D., Sheridan, B. & Luo, G. RUMM2020. Rasch unidimensional measurement models software. RUMM laboratory, Perth, Western Australia, 2007.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3