What Do Service Users with Psychosis Want from Psychological Interventions Regarding Outcome Priorities and Delivery Mode? A Systematic Review

Author:

Rogerson Shauna,Twomey ConalORCID

Abstract

AbstractDespite previous investigations of service user preferences for the overall mental health service treatment of psychosis, there is uncertainty surrounding the specific psychological intervention preferences of service users with psychosis. We conducted a systematic review of 10 studies outlining the psychological intervention preferences of service users with psychosis, organising the findings into outcome priorities and delivery mode preferences. Service users generally prioritised various psychosocial outcomes—more specifically emotional, behavioural, self-reflective, and quality of life outcomes—with outcomes related to psychosis symptoms considered less important. Regarding delivery mode, there were indicated preferences for some level of individualised care over the sole provision of group interventions. There were also some indicated preferences for collaborative formulation within psychological interventions and remote delivery options. Notwithstanding various methodological limitations, the findings could be considered as a progressive preliminary step towards the increased accommodation of the psychological intervention preferences of service users with psychosis.

Funder

University College Dublin

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3