Challenges in Adopting Recovery-oriented Practices in Specialized Mental Health Care: “How Far Should Self-Determination Go; Should One be Allowed to Perish?”

Author:

Ørjasæter Kristin B.ORCID,Almvik Arve

Abstract

AbstractMental health services need to transform from a primary focus on symptom reduction to a recovery-oriented delivery. Research on recovery-oriented practices is mainly based in community mental health settings, while research on specialized mental health care remains scarce. In this article, we aim to identify and explore the experiences faced by professionals working in specialized mental health care units that aim to be recovery-oriented. Data were collected during seven focus group interviews with 45 professionals from four psychiatric hospitals and district psychiatric centers in Norway. We used reflexive thematic analysis to interpret the data. Three main themes emerged from the analysis: (a) disease-oriented structures, (b) negotiating roles and (c) risk management. This study identified the many tensions professionals face as they try to shift specialized mental health care toward a recovery-oriented paradigm. Specifically, professionals must balance managing risks and promoting self-determination. To succeed, it is not sufficient to implement practices that are characterized as recovery-oriented without also changing existing systems, structures, and frameworks. We suggest approaching recovery orientation through shared decision-making. This could contribute to the promotion of self-determination and increased inpatient safety in specialized mental health care.

Funder

Nord University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference51 articles.

1. Aston, V., & Coffey, M. (2012). Recovery: what mental health nurses and service users say about the concept of recovery. Journal of Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing, 19(3), 257-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01776.x

2. Australian Health Ministers` Advisory Counsil. (2013). A national framework for recovery-oriented mental health services. Policy and theory. https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2021/04/a-national-framework-for-recovery-oriented-mental-health-services-policy-and-theory.pdf

3. Beyene, L. S. (2020). The meaning of shared decision-making in mental care – A hermeneutical study. University of Stavanger.

4. Beyene, L. S., Severinsson, E., Hansen, B. S., & Rørtveit, K. (2019). Being in a space of sharing decision‐making for dignified mental care. Journal of Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing, 26(9-10), 368-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12548

5. Boardman, J., & Roberts, G. (2014). Risk, safety and recovery. https://imroc.org/resources/9-risk-safety-recovery/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3