The Parity of privies: Summary research on privies in North Carolina-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Parity of privies: Summary research on privies in North Carolina

Published:2000-03 Issue:1 Volume:34 Page:97-110
ISSN:0440-9213
Container-title:Historical Archaeology
language:en
Short-container-title:Hist Arch

Author:

Carnes-McNaughton Linda F.,Harper Terry M.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Archaeology,History,Archaeology

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF03373633.pdf

Reference33 articles.

1. Beaman, Thomas, Jr., John J. Mintz, and Kenneth Robinson 1996 Archaeological Study of the Beam Family Properties Associated with the Replacement of Bridge 230 on SR 1908 (New Prospect Church Road) over Buffalo Creek, Cleveland County, North Carolina. Manuscript, North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh.

2. Booker, Warren H. 1914a The Practical Rural Privy: Why So-called Sanitary Privies Are a Failure in the Country and a Partial Remedy Proposed. North Carolina Board of Health, The Health Bulletin 28(12):263–266.

3. 1914b City Privies: A Practical Design for Sanitary Privies for Urban Use. North Carolina Board of Health, The Health Bulletin 28(12):267–271.

4. Cain, William 1879 Sanitary Engineering. North Carolina Board of Health. Hale and Edwards, Broughton.

5. Clauser, John W. 1982 Test Excavations at Raleigh’s Union Square: An Inspection of Archaeological Remains at North Carolina’s Capitol. Manuscript, North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, Division of Archives and History, Raleigh.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pondering Privies: Construction, Use, Reuse, and Other Speculations About Cesspits in the Archaeological Record;Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory;2020-06-04

2. Sanitary Reform and Comparative Assemblage Analysis: Methodology;Exploring the Archaeology of the Modern City in Nineteenth-century Australia;2019

3. Cesspit formation processes and waste management history in Melbourne: evidence from Little Lon;Australian Archaeology;2016-01-02