Author:
Kumar Sonu,Mazhari Mohammad Yusuf Ali,Singh Poonam,Priyadarshi Mayank,Chaurasia Suman,Basu Sriparna
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference4 articles.
1. Zhu X, Qi H, Feng Z, Shi Y, De Luca D, Nasal Oscillation Post-Extubation (NASONE) Study Group. Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as postextubation support for preterm neonates in China: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2022;176:551–9.
2. Shi HK, Liang KL, An LH, Zhang B, Zhang CY. Efficacy of noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants: a meta analysis [Article in Chinese]. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2023;25:295–301.
3. Zhu X, Li F, Shi Y, Feng Z, De Luca D, Nasal Oscillation Post-Extubation (NASONE) Study Group. Effectiveness of nasal continuous positive airway pressure vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation vs noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation as support after extubation of neonates born extremely preterm or with more severe respiratory failure: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6:e2321644.
4. Zhu X, Feng Z, Liu C, Shi L, Shi Y, Ramanathan R, NHFOV Study Group. Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants with moderate respiratory distress syndrome: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Neonatology. 2021;118:325–31.