Manganese exposure from spring and well waters in the Shenandoah Valley: interplay of aquifer lithology, soil composition, and redox conditions
-
Published:2024-05-02
Issue:6
Volume:46
Page:
-
ISSN:0269-4042
-
Container-title:Environmental Geochemistry and Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Environ Geochem Health
Author:
Hinkle Margaret A. G.,Ziegler Brady,Culbertson Haley,Goldmann Christopher,Croy Marina E.,Willis Noah,Ling Erin,Reinhart Benjamin,Lyon Eva C.
Abstract
AbstractManganese (Mn) is of particular concern in groundwater, as low-level chronic exposure to aqueous Mn concentrations in drinking water can result in a variety of health and neurodevelopmental effects. Much of the global population relies on drinking water sourced from karst aquifers. Thus, we seek to assess the relative risk of Mn contamination in karst by investigating the Shenandoah Valley, VA region, as it is underlain by both karst and non-karst aquifers and much of the population relies on water wells and spring water. Water and soil samples were collected throughout the Shenandoah Valley, to supplement pre-existing well water and spring data from the National Water Information System and the Virginia Household Water Quality Program, totaling 1815 wells and 119 springs. Soils were analyzed using X-ray fluorescence and Mn K-Edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectroscopy. Factors such as soil type, soil geochemistry, and aquifer lithology were linked with each location to determine if correlations exist with aqueous Mn concentrations. Analyzing the distribution of Mn in drinking water sources suggests that water wells and springs within karst aquifers are preferable with respect to chronic Mn exposure, with < 4.9% of wells and springs in dolostone and limestone aquifers exceeding 100 ppb Mn, while sandstone and shale aquifers have a heightened risk, with > 20% of wells exceeding 100 ppb Mn. The geochemistry of associated soils and spatial relationships to various hydrologic and geologic features indicates that water interactions with aquifer lithology and soils contribute to aqueous Mn concentrations. Relationships between aqueous Mn in spring waters and Mn in soils indicate that increasing aqueous Mn is correlated with decreasing soil Mn(IV). These results point to redox conditions exerting a dominant control on Mn in this region.
Funder
Keck Geology Consortium Washington and Lee University Department of Earth and Environmental Geoscience, Washington and Lee University Virginia Cooperative Extension
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference100 articles.
1. Aiken, M. L., Pace, C. E., Ramachandran, M., Schwabe, K. A., Ajami, H., Link, B. G., & Ying, S. C. (2023). Disparities in drinking water manganese concentrations in domestic wells and community water systems in the Central Valley, CA, USA. Environmental Science & Technology, 57, 1987–1996. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c08548 2. Amirbahman, A., Schönenberger, R., Johnson, C. A., & Sigg, L. (1998). Aqueous- and solid-phase biogeochemistry of a calcareous aquifer system downgradient from a municipal solid waste landfill (Winterthur, Switzerland). Environmental Science & Technology, 32(13), 1933–1940. https://doi.org/10.1021/es970810j 3. Bacquart, T., Frisbie, S., Mitchell, E., Grigg, L., Cole, C., Small, C., & Sarkar, B. (2015). Multiple inorganic toxic substances contaminating the groundwater of Myingyan Township, Myanmar: Arsenic, manganese, fluoride, iron, and uranium. Science of the Total Environment, 517, 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.038 4. Benham, B., Ling, E., Ziegler, P., & Krometis, L. A. (2016). What’s in your water? Development and evaluation of the virginia household water quality program and virginia master well owner network. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension. https://doi.org/10.54718/ATYW3374 5. Bjerg, P. L., Ruegge, K., Pedersen, J. K., & Christensen, T. H. (1995). Distribution of redox-sensitive groundwater quality parameters downgradient of a landfill (Grindsted, Denmark). Environmental Science and Technology, 29(5), 1387–1394. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00005a035
|
|