Abstract
AbstractGeophagy is a common practice among rural population of the Fetakgomo Tubatse Local Municipality area in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. Although, the practice might be beneficial to the health of the consumers, its negative effects could overshadow the positive effects and might lead to detrimental health issues. The present work sought to investigate the geochemical composition as well as pH and organic matter (OM) content of geophagic materials commonly consumed in the study area. Furthermore, assessment of the potential health risk of the materials on geophagic individuals was also considered. Twelve samples were collected in the study area and analysed by X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) and Inductively Coupled Plasma—Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) for major and trace elements composition. The results showed higher concentrations of non-essential elements (e.g., As, Cr, Pb) than the proposed recommended daily standards intake, suggesting a potential health risk. The alkaline nature (pH 6.80 to 9.22) of the studied samples might affect the bioacessibility of some essential elements. Furthermore, the OM content (> 0.7%) observed in some of the studied samples may retain pathogenic micro-organisms detrimental to health. Although As and Cr presented a low bioaccessible fraction (< 16.0%), health risk assessment revealed that their concentrations represented a hazard (HQ > 1) and might induce non-carcinogenic health threats to geophagic individuals. Based on the geochemical analysis, pH and OM content as well as health risk assessment findings, the studied geophagic materials are not considered suitable for human consumption. The practice should therefore be discouraged amongst the population in the study area to avoid possible detrimental health issues.
Funder
National Research Foundation
University of Johannesburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geochemistry and Petrology,General Environmental Science,Water Science and Technology,Environmental Chemistry,General Medicine,Environmental Engineering
Reference81 articles.
1. Al Alawi, A. M., Majoni, S. W., & Falhammar, H. (2018). Magnesium and human health: perspectives and research directions. International Journal of Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9041694
2. Alasfar, R. H., & Isaifan, R. J. (2021). Aluminum environmental pollution: The silent killer. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(33), 44587–44597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14700-0
3. ATSDR (Agency for toxic substances and disease registry) (2004). Interaction profile for Lead, Manganese, Zinc, and Copper. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/interactionprofiles/ip06.html
4. ATSDR (Agency for toxic substances and disease registry) (2011). Priority list of hazardous substances. Agency for toxic substances and diseases. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/spl/resources/2011_atsdr_substance_priority_list.html
5. ATSDR (Agency for toxic substances and disease registry) (2012). Toxicological profile for manganese. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=102&tid=23.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Geophagic practices in Africa;Medical Geology of Africa: a Research Primer;2024