1. Adinolfi A (2012) The “procedural autonomy” of Member States and the constraints stemming from the ECJ’s case law: Is judicial activism still necessary. In: Micklitz H-W, De Witte B (eds) The European Court of Justice and the autonomy of the Member States. Intersentia, Antwerp/Cambridge, pp 281–303
2. Bobek M (2012) Why there is no principle of “procedural autonomy” of the Member States. In: Micklitz H-W, De Witte B (eds) The European Court of Justice and the autonomy of the Member States. Intersentia, Antwerp/Cambridge, pp 305–323
3. Cadiet L (2006) Ouverture – D’un code à l’autre: de fondations en refondation. In: Cadiet L, Canivet G (eds) De la commémoration d’un code à l’autre: 200 ans de procédure civile en France. LexisNexis, Paris, pp 3–17
4. Chadelat C (2006) Point de vue – L’élaboration d’un code de procédure civile, entre pratique judiciaire et droit savant. In: Cadiet L, Canivet G (eds) De la commémoration d’un code à l’autre: 200 ans de procédure civile en France. LexisNexis, Paris, pp 48–74
5. Conant L (2002) Justice contained: Law and politics in the European Union. Cornell University Press, London/Ithaca