Abstract
AbstractThe recent turn in the debate on AI regulation from ethics to law, the wide application of AI and the new challenges it poses in a variety of fields of human activities are urging legislators to find a paradigm of reference to assess the impacts of AI and to guide its development. This cannot only be done at a general level, on the basis of guiding principles and provisions, but the paradigm must be embedded into the development and deployment of each application. To this end, this chapter suggests a model for human rights impact assessment (HRIA) as part of the broader HRESIA model. This is a response to the lack of a formal methodology to facilitate an ex-ante approach based on a human-oriented design of AI. The result is a tool that can be easily used by entities involved in AI development from the outset in the design of new AI solutions and can follow the product/service throughout its lifecycle, providing specific, measurable and comparable evidence on potential impacts, their probability, extension, and severity, and facilitating comparison between possible alternative options.
Reference117 articles.
1. Abrahams D, Wyss Y (2010) Guide to Human Rights Impact Assessment and Management (HRIAM). International Business Leaders Forum, International Finance Corporation and UN Global Compact, Washington.
2. Access Now (2019) Laying down the Law on AI: Ethics Done, Now the EU Must Focus on Human Rights. https://www.accessnow.org/laying-down-the-law-on-ai-ethics-done-now-the-eu-must-focus-on-human-rights/. Accessed 7 April 2021.
3. Algorithm Watch (2020) Automating Society report 2020. https://automatingsociety.algorithmwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Automating-Society-Report-2020.pdf. Accessed 23 January 2021.
4. Artyushina A (2020) Is civic data governance the key to democratic smart cities? The role of the urban data trust in Sidewalk Toronto. 55 Telematics and Informatics, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101456.
5. Aven T (2011) On Different Types of Uncertainties in the Context of the Precautionary Principle. Risk Analysis 31(10): 1515-1525.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献