Human Rights Impact Assessment and AI

Author:

Mantelero Alessandro

Abstract

AbstractThe recent turn in the debate on AI regulation from ethics to law, the wide application of AI and the new challenges it poses in a variety of fields of human activities are urging legislators to find a paradigm of reference to assess the impacts of AI and to guide its development. This cannot only be done at a general level, on the basis of guiding principles and provisions, but the paradigm must be embedded into the development and deployment of each application. To this end, this chapter suggests a model for human rights impact assessment (HRIA) as part of the broader HRESIA model. This is a response to the lack of a formal methodology to facilitate an ex-ante approach based on a human-oriented design of AI. The result is a tool that can be easily used by entities involved in AI development from the outset in the design of new AI solutions and can follow the product/service throughout its lifecycle, providing specific, measurable and comparable evidence on potential impacts, their probability, extension, and severity, and facilitating comparison between possible alternative options.

Publisher

T.M.C. Asser Press

Reference117 articles.

1. Abrahams D, Wyss Y (2010) Guide to Human Rights Impact Assessment and Management (HRIAM). International Business Leaders Forum, International Finance Corporation and UN Global Compact, Washington.

2. Access Now (2019) Laying down the Law on AI: Ethics Done, Now the EU Must Focus on Human Rights. https://www.accessnow.org/laying-down-the-law-on-ai-ethics-done-now-the-eu-must-focus-on-human-rights/. Accessed 7 April 2021.

3. Algorithm Watch (2020) Automating Society report 2020. https://automatingsociety.algorithmwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Automating-Society-Report-2020.pdf. Accessed 23 January 2021.

4. Artyushina A (2020) Is civic data governance the key to democratic smart cities? The role of the urban data trust in Sidewalk Toronto. 55 Telematics and Informatics, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101456.

5. Aven T (2011) On Different Types of Uncertainties in the Context of the Precautionary Principle. Risk Analysis 31(10): 1515-1525.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3