Undetected pseudoprogressions in the CeTeG/NOA-09 trial: hints from postprogression survival and MRI analyses
-
Published:2023-09
Issue:3
Volume:164
Page:607-616
-
ISSN:0167-594X
-
Container-title:Journal of Neuro-Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Neurooncol
Author:
Zeyen Thomas, Paech Daniel, Weller Johannes, Schäfer Niklas, Tzaridis Theophilos, Duffy Cathrina, Nitsch Louisa, Schneider Matthias, Potthoff Anna-Laura, Steinbach Joachim Peter, Hau Peter, Schlegel Uwe, Seidel Clemens, Krex Dietmar, Grauer Oliver, Goldbrunner Roland, Zeiner Pia Susan, Tabatabai Ghazaleh, Galldiks Norbert, Stummer Walter, Hattingen Elke, Glas Martin, Radbruch Alexander, Herrlinger Ulrich, Schaub ChristinaORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
In the randomized CeTeG/NOA-09 trial, lomustine/temozolomide (CCNU/TMZ) was superior to TMZ therapy regarding overall survival (OS) in MGMT promotor-methylated glioblastoma. Progression-free survival (PFS) and pseudoprogression rates (about 10%) were similar in both arms. Further evaluating this discrepancy, we analyzed patterns of postprogression survival (PPS) and MRI features at first progression according to modified RANO criteria (mRANO).
Methods
We classified the patients of the CeTeG/NOA-09 trial according to long vs. short PPS employing a cut-off of 18 months and compared baseline characteristics and survival times. In patients with available MRIs and confirmed progression, the increase in T1-enhancing, FLAIR hyperintense lesion volume and the change in ADC mean value of contrast-enhancing tumor upon progression were determined.
Results
Patients with long PPS in the CCNU/TMZ arm had a particularly short PFS (5.6 months). PFS in this subgroup was shorter than in the long PPS subgroup of the TMZ arm (11.1 months, p = 0.01). At mRANO-defined progression, patients of the CCNU/TMZ long PPS subgroup had a significantly higher increase of mean ADC values (p = 0.015) and a tendency to a stronger volumetric increase in T1-enhancement (p = 0.22) as compared to long PPS patients of the TMZ arm.
Conclusion
The combination of survival and MRI analyses identified a subgroup of CCNU/TMZ-treated patients with features that sets them apart from other patients in the trial: short first PFS despite long PPS and significant increase in mean ADC values upon mRANO-defined progression. The observed pattern is compatible with the features commonly observed in pseudoprogression suggesting mRANO-undetected pseudoprogressions in the CCNU/TMZ arm of CeTeG/NOA-09.
Funder
Universitätsklinikum Bonn
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cancer Research,Neurology (clinical),Neurology,Oncology
Reference31 articles.
1. Kruser TJ, Mehta MP, Robins HI (2013) Pseudoprogression after glioma therapy: a comprehensive review. Expert Rev Neurother 13(4):389–403. https://doi.org/10.1586/ern.13.7. (PMID: 23545054) 2. Ellingson BM, Chung C, Pope WB, Boxerman JL, Kaufmann TJ (2017) Pseudoprogression, radionecrosis, inflammation or true tumor progression? challenges associated with glioblastoma response assessment in an evolving therapeutic landscape. J Neurooncol 134(3):495–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2375-2 3. Wen PY, Chang SM, Van den Bent MJ, Vogelbaum MA, Macdonald DR, Lee EQ (2017) Response assessment in neuro-oncology clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 35(21):2439–2449. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.72.7511 4. Jia W, Gao Q, Han A, Zhu H, Yu J (2019) The potential mechanism, recognition and clinical significance of tumor pseudoprogression after immunotherapy. Cancer Biol Med 16(4):655–670 5. Himes BT, Arnett AL, Merrell KW, Gates MJ, Bhargav AG, Raghunathan A, Brown DA, Burns TC, Parney IF (2020) Glioblastoma recurrence versus treatment effect in a pathology-documented series. Can J Neurol Sci 47(4):525–530. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2020.36
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|