Surgical resection versus biopsy in the treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Despite the improvement in treatment and prognosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) over the last decades, the 5-year survival rate is approximately 30%; thus, new therapeutic approaches are needed to improve patient survival. The study’s aim was to evaluate the role of surgical resection of PCNSL. Methods Primary outcomes were the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with PCNSL who underwent surgical resection versus biopsy alone. The meta-analysis was conducted to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) under a random-effects model for the time-to-event variables. The odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for binary, secondary outcome parameters. Results Seven studies (n = 1046) were included. We found that surgical resection was associated with significantly better OS (HR 0.63 [95% CI 0.51–0.77]) when compared with biopsy. PFS was also significantly improved (HR 0.64 [95% CI 0.49–0.85]) in patients who underwent resection compared with those who underwent biopsy. The heterogeneity for OS and PFS was low (I2 = 7% and 24%, respectively). We also found that patients who underwent biopsy more often had multiple (OR 0.38 [95% CI 0.19–0.79]) or deep-seated (OR 0.20 [95% CI 0.12–0.34]) lesions compared with those who underwent surgical resection. There were no significant differences in chemotherapy or radiotherapy use or the occurrence of postoperative complications between the two groups. Conclusion In selected patients, surgical resection of PCNSL is associated with significantly better overall survival and progression-free survival compared with biopsy alone.