Author:
Nosek D.,Samsel O.,Pokój T.,Cydzik-Kwiatkowska A.
Abstract
AbstractThe commercialization of microbial fuel cell technology is limited by high operating costs and low electricity production due to poor electron transfer to the anode. Operational costs can be lowered by utilizing waste materials, and cell performance can be improved by anode modification. This study investigated how anode modification with iron compounds changed the efficiency of energy generation and the microbiome of microbial fuel cells fueled with waste volatile fatty acids from a full-scale anaerobic digestion. Anode modification with 2.5 g Fe2O3/m2 increased the power density, current density, and voltage by 3.6-fold, 1.8-fold, and 1.4-fold, respectively. In the microbial fuel cell influent, propionic, enanthic, and iso-caproic acids predominated (60, 15, and 13% of all volatile fatty acids, respectively); in the outflow, propionic (71%) and valeric acids (17%) predominated. In anodic biofilms, Acidovorax sp. were most abundant; they have a great capacity for volatile fatty acids decomposition, and their abundance doubled in the microbial fuel cell with an iron-modified anode. The presence of iron significantly increased the abundance of the genera Pseudomonas and Geothrix, which were mainly responsible for electricity production. These results indicate that anode modification with iron changes the anode microbiome, favoring efficient volatile fatty acids metabolism and a greater abundance of electrogens in the biofilm, which ensures better electricity generation.
Funder
Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki
Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Regional Initiative of Excellence
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,Environmental Chemistry,Environmental Engineering
Reference59 articles.
1. Ali N, Anam M, Yousaf S, Maleeha S, Bangash Z (2017) Characterization of the electric current generation potential of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa using glucose, fructose, and sucrose in double chamber microbial fuel cell. Iran J Biotechnol 15(4):216–223. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijb.1608
2. APHA (1992) Standard Methods for the Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th ed.; American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), Water Pollution Control Federation (WPCF): Washington, DC, USA
3. Bao MD, Su HJ, Tan TW (2013) Dark fermentative bio-hydrogen production: effects of substrate pre-treatment and addition of metal ions or L-cysteine. Fuel 112:38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.04.063
4. Beech IB, Gaylarde CC (1999) Recent advances in the study of biocorrosion: an overview. Rev Argent Microbiol 30(3):117–190. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37141999000300001
5. Bułkowska K, Mikucka W, Pokój T (2021) Enhancement of biogas production from cattle manure using glycerine phase as a co-substrate in anaerobic digestion. Fuel 317:123456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123456
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献