Assessing the Belt and Road Initiative as a narrative: Implications for institutional change and international firm strategy

Author:

Casas-Klett Tomas,Li JiataoORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis article explores the role of narratives as drivers that guide the institutional change associated with globalization and deglobalization. For China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to succeed as a driver of institutional change in favor of globalization, it must pass the narrative “virality” test and successfully contend with competing narratives. Rival narratives will be launched by firms and organizations worldwide that expect to win or lose from deglobalization or from new forms of globalization. This study develops a useful framework for establishing the extent to which China’s BRI is a genuine narrative or just a story. In this regard, four testable propositions are put forth to ascertain whether the BRI is values-based, extends an invitation to participate, is open-ended, and is associated with economic performance for both Chinese and non-Chinese participants. The analysis of the BRI-related institutional change that leads to globalization applies a theoretical lens centered on the narrative economics perspective and on the institution-based view and political economy perspective. Implications for BRI stakeholders, international business practitioners, and international business scholarship are outlined.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Strategy and Management,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Business and International Management

Reference68 articles.

1. Abell, P. (2004). Narrative explanation: An alternative to variable-centered explanation? Annual Review of Sociology, 30: 287-310.

2. Ahlstrom, D. 2012. On the types of papers the Asia Pacific Journal of Management generally publishes. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(1): 1–7.

3. Allenby, B., & Garreau, J. 2017. Weaponized narrative is the new battlespace. Defense One. http://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2017/01/weaponized-narrative-new-battlespace/134284/, Accessed May 6, 2020.

4. Allison, G. 2017. Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides’ trap? New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

5. Bang, K. E., & Markeset, T. 2012. Identifying the drivers of economic globalization and the effects on companies’ competitive situation. In Proceedings of the IFIP WG 5.7 international conference on advances in production management systems, value networks: Innovation, technologies, and management: 233–241. Stavanger, Norway: HAL.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3