Expression and Relations of Unique miRNAs Investigated in Metabolic Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review

Author:

Hany Mohamed,Demerdash Hala M,Abouelnasr Anwar Ashraf,Torensma BartORCID

Abstract

AbstractSeveral studies have indicated that miRNAs play crucial roles in adipogenesis, insulin resistance, and inflammatory pathways associated with obesity and change after metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). This systematic review explores and maps the existing literature on how miRNAs are expressed and investigates the unique miRNAs with the effects after MBS. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, and EMBASE were searched from 2019 until February 2024. This SR found 825 miRNAs from 25 studies, identifying 507 unique ones not used twice in the same study. A total of 21 studies (84%) measured RNA before and after surgery. The miRNA used per study ranged from 1 to 146 miRNA types, with a median study sample size of just 27 patients per study, raising concerns about some conclusions’ robustness. From the 507 unique miRNAs, only 16 were consistently analyzed in 4 to 7 studies, which gave 77 different outcomes in relation to miRNA after MBS. MiRNA 122 and 122-5p were analyzed the most. Others were 106b-5p, 140-5p, 183-5p, 199b-5p, 20b-5p, 424-5p, 486-5p, 7-5p, 92a, 93-5p, 194-5p, 21-5p, 221, 320a, and 223-3p. A gap was observed in many studies, whereby the results were not the same, or there was no explanation for the effects after MBS was given within the same miRNA. Fifteen miRNAs were reported to have the same upward and downward trend, although not within the same study, and only 26.1% employed some form of statistical modeling to account for bias or confounding factors. Directions and effects in miRNA are visible, but still, inconsistent outcomes linked to the same miRNA after MBS, underscoring the need for clarity in miRNA-outcome relationships. Collaborative efforts, consensus-driven miRNA dictionaries, and larger, more rigorous studies are necessary to improve methodology designs and improve outcomes.

Funder

Alexandria University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3