Author:
Lykaki Maria,Mandela Evridiki,Varvoutis Georgios,Lampropoulos Athanasios,Marnellos George E.,Konsolakis Michalis
Abstract
AbstractThe unprecedented increase of atmospheric CO2 concentration and the associated climate change calls for the urgent implementation of CO2 mitigation approaches. Among the various proposed measures, CO2 capture from several industrial point sources or directly from air and its subsequent hydrogenation via renewable H2 towards value-added products formation has gained particular attention. Specifically, the production of CO or CH4 is of great importance for the eventual generation of liquid fuels or synthetic natural gas, respectively. Herein, an overview of the state-of-the-art noble and non-noble metal-based catalysts employed for the thermocatalytic CO2 hydrogenation towards CO (reverse water–gas shift reaction, rWGS) or CH4 (Sabatier reaction) is elaborated. A brief description of fundamental considerations is initially provided for each reaction, involving thermodynamic, mechanistic and kinetics considerations. Then, the recent catalytic studies on rWGS and Sabatier reactions over both noble metal and non-noble metal catalysts (e.g., metal oxides, carbides, metal organic frameworks) are discussed from the perspective of structure–property relationships. Lastly, the most important conclusions arising from the comparative analysis of the most promising catalysts are summarized and are complemented with proposed outlooks associated with future directions towards the rational design of highly active and selective catalytic materials for each process.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference334 articles.
1. Intergouvernemental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis: Summary for Policymakers: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
2. Yan J, Zhang Z. Carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS). Appl Energy. 2019;235:1289–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.019.
3. Thonemann N, Pizzol M. Consequential life cycle assessment of carbon capture and utilization technologies within the chemical industry. Energy Environ Sci. 2019;12:2253–63. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ee00914k.
4. Lopes JVM, Bresciani AE, Carvalho KM, Kulay LA, Alves RMB. Multi-criteria decision approach to select carbon dioxide and hydrogen sources as potential raw materials for the production of chemicals. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2021;151: 111542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111542.
5. Chauvy R, Meunier N, Thomas D, De Weireld G. Selecting emerging CO2 utilization products for short- to mid-term deployment. Appl Energy. 2019;236:662–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.096.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献